From: "Stanley Chang[昌育德]" <stanley_chang@realtek.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-phy@lists.infradead.org" <linux-phy@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/3] Revert "usb: phy: add usb phy notify port status API"
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 06:44:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <28e77cbc531248bf913ceedba6425cf6@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZUjM/VEliT5c8H4C@matsya>
Hi Johan and Vinod,
I modified the Realtek phy to solve this issue and only use the generic PHY.
And submitted these patches today as follows
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20231107063518.27824-1-stanley_chang@realtek.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20231107063518.27824-2-stanley_chang@realtek.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20231107063518.27824-3-stanley_chang@realtek.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20231107063518.27824-4-stanley_chang@realtek.com/
I don't think this patch is needed to revert a08799cf17c2 ("usb:phy: New usb phy notification port status API").
Thanks,
Stanley
> On 06-11-23, 12:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 12:06:51PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > The recently added Realtek PHY drivers depend on the new port status
> > > notification mechanism which was built on the deprecated USB PHY
> > > implementation and devicetree binding.
> > >
> > > Specifically, using these PHYs would require describing the very
> > > same PHY using both the generic "phy" property and the deprecated
> "usb-phy"
> > > property which is clearly wrong.
> > >
> > > We should not be building new functionality on top of the legacy USB
> > > PHY implementation even if it is currently stuck in some kind of
> > > transitional limbo.
> > >
> > > Revert the new Realtek PHY drivers for now so that the port status
> > > notification interface can be reverted and replaced before we dig
> > > ourselves into an even deeper hole with this PHY mess.
> > >
> > > Note that there are no upstream users of these PHYs and the drivers
> > > were only included in 6.6 so there should still be time to undo this.
> >
> > No users of these phy drivers yet? Why were they added?
>
> Not sure why, they didnt go thru phy ss!
>
> >
> > > Preferably these should go in through Greg's tree for 6.7-rc1.
> >
> > I'll be glad to take this if I can get an ack for it.
>
> Pls do drop this:
>
> Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
>
> --
> ~Vinod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-07 6:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-06 11:06 [PATCH 0/3] Revert "usb: phy: add usb phy notify port status API" Johan Hovold
2023-11-06 11:06 ` Johan Hovold
2023-11-06 11:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] Revert "phy: realtek: usb: Add driver for the Realtek SoC USB 3.0 PHY" Johan Hovold
2023-11-06 11:06 ` Johan Hovold
2023-11-06 11:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] Revert "phy: realtek: usb: Add driver for the Realtek SoC USB 2.0 PHY" Johan Hovold
2023-11-06 11:06 ` Johan Hovold
2023-11-06 11:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] Revert "usb: phy: add usb phy notify port status API" Johan Hovold
2023-11-06 11:06 ` Johan Hovold
2023-11-06 11:15 ` [PATCH 0/3] " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-11-06 11:15 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-11-06 11:24 ` Vinod Koul
2023-11-06 11:24 ` Vinod Koul
2023-11-06 13:48 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-11-06 13:48 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-11-07 6:44 ` Stanley Chang[昌育德] [this message]
2023-11-07 7:02 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-11-07 7:02 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-11-07 7:54 ` Stanley Chang[昌育德]
2023-11-06 11:25 ` Johan Hovold
2023-11-06 11:25 ` Johan Hovold
2023-11-06 13:48 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-11-06 13:48 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=28e77cbc531248bf913ceedba6425cf6@realtek.com \
--to=stanley_chang@realtek.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=johan+linaro@kernel.org \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.