From: GiovanniB <giovannib1979@ymail.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: Problem with booting 2.6.32.16 pvops DomU
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 02:51:10 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <29105236.post@talk.nabble.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C349E82.30100@goop.org>
Hello
same problem here.
Supermicro Board
XEON E5506
xm dmesg:
(XEN) traps.c:2230:d11 Domain attempted WRMSR 000000000000008b from
00000011:00000000 to 00000000:00000000.
(XEN) traps.c:2230:d11 Domain attempted WRMSR 000000000000008b from
00000011:00000000 to 00000000:00000000.
(XEN) traps.c:2230:d11 Domain attempted WRMSR 000000000000008b from
00000011:00000000 to 00000000:00000000.
(XEN) traps.c:2230:d12 Domain attempted WRMSR 000000000000008b from
00000011:00000000 to 00000000:00000000.
(XEN) traps.c:2230:d12 Domain attempted WRMSR 000000000000008b from
00000011:00000000 to 00000000:00000000.
(XEN) traps.c:2230:d12 Domain attempted WRMSR 000000000000008b from
00000011:00000000 to 00000000:00000000.
(XEN) traps.c:2230:d12 Domain attempted WRMSR 000000000000008b from
00000011:00000000 to 00000000:00000000
domU hangs here with 400% CPU load (4 vcpus)
(same problem with 1 vcpu)
...
[ 1.807477] kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
[ 2.005607] EXT3 FS on xvda1, internal journal
[ 2.005618] EXT3-fs: recovery complete.
[ 2.005626] EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with writeback data mode.
[ 2.005643] VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) on device 202:1.
[ 2.005727] Freeing unused kernel memory: 580k freed
[ 2.005892] Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 8160k
here it hangs
2.6.32.15 there is no problem. I have used the same .config for 2.6.32.16.
I have recompiled it with no energy save option, same error.
C1 and else are disabled in BIOS.
Regards
Gio
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
> On 07/07/2010 02:07 AM, Carsten Schiers wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I tried to boot a 64 Bit 2.6.32.16 pvops DomU from Jeremy's git on Xen
>> 3.4.4-rc1-pre
>> and 64 Bit 2.6.18.8 Dom0.
>>
>> It will hang very quickly after 0.5 secs and produce the following output
>> on xm dmesg:
>>
>> (XEN) traps.c:2230:d25 Domain attempted WRMSR 00000000c0010004 from
>> 00009310:79804ace to 00000000:00000000
>>
>> (XEN) traps.c:2230:d25 Domain attempted WRMSR 00000000c0010000 from
>> 00000009:0487e489 to 00000000:00430076
>>
>
> Do you get any other console output? Could you boot with
> "earlyprink=xen" (and "console=hvc0" if you don't already) on the kernel
> command line to see if any more comes out.
>
> Those two MSRs relate to the K8 performance counter subsystem, but I
> can't see any obviously relevent changes in 2.6.32.15->16 which might
> cause this regression.
>
> It might also be useful to use xenctx to work out where the hang is.
>
> Thanks,
> J
>
>>
>> BR,
>> Carsten.
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Originalnachricht -----
>> Von: Carsten Schiers <carsten@schiers.de>
>> Gesendet: Mon, 5.7.2010 11:09
>> An: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>> Betreff: [Xen-devel] Question on xenpm
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> after having upgraded my server from AMD 4050e to X4 640, I now use
>> cpufreq=xen and had
>> to adapt a munin script (monitoring tool) to display the residency in the
>> different P-states.
>> This script uses /sys/device/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq to read out the
>> information, whereas
>> I now use xenpm get-cpufreq-state.
>>
>> Before I noticed that the CPU is in highest possible P-state (lowest
>> frequences) nearly all
>> of the time, and a minimal percentage in the lowest. Now I can see a
>> 50/50 distribution.
>> Interesting enough, the xenpm get-cpuidle-state will show that the CPUs
>> are at aprox. 90%
>> in C1 idle state.
>>
>> Can there be a difference in how the two methods to collect the info are
>> working? I mean
>> something like xenpm will not count residency when in C1, but cpufreq
>> driver will normaly
>> do?
>>
>> BR,
>> Carsten.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Problem-with-booting-2.6.32.16-pvops-DomU-tp29094017p29105236.html
Sent from the Xen - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-08 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-07 9:07 Problem with booting 2.6.32.16 pvops DomU Carsten Schiers
2010-07-07 15:34 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-07-08 9:51 ` GiovanniB [this message]
2010-07-13 16:51 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=29105236.post@talk.nabble.com \
--to=giovannib1979@ymail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.