From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] ethdev: ensure consistent port id assignment Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 17:11:45 +0200 Message-ID: <29406326.BbypyUUmXA@xps13> References: <5905C8E33883CA46A8878E2D7724E21516DF5D@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com> <68D830D942438745AD09BAFA99E33E812746D0@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> <5905C8E33883CA46A8878E2D7724E215172927@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Kerlin, MarcinX" To: "Tootoonchian, Amin" Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com (mail-wm0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2393A2B9D for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 17:11:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id q128so60368168wma.1 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:11:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5905C8E33883CA46A8878E2D7724E215172927@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi, 2016-07-20 15:07, Tootoonchian, Amin: > Thomas, your thoughts? I have 2 thoughts: - it is too big for 16.07 - it is related to multi-process mechanism, maintained by Sergio ;) Sorry I won't look at it shortly.