From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <45343.31878.qm@web36610.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <45343.31878.qm@web36610.mail.mud.yahoo.com> To: casey@schaufler-ca.com Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, sds@tycho.nsa.gov, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Adding a security parameter to VFS functions Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:52:17 +0100 Message-ID: <2945.1187196737@redhat.com> Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Casey Schaufler wrote: > > Could you describe how this compares to the proposal that the > AppArmor developers suggested recently? I expect that we can > reduce the amount of discussion required, and maybe avoid some > confusion if you could do that. I don't know what that is. David -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764951AbXHOQxa (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:53:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756740AbXHOQxV (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:53:21 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:50941 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756716AbXHOQxT (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:53:19 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <45343.31878.qm@web36610.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <45343.31878.qm@web36610.mail.mud.yahoo.com> To: casey@schaufler-ca.com Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, sds@tycho.nsa.gov, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Adding a security parameter to VFS functions X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0.3; nmh 1.2-20070115cvs; GNU Emacs 22.1.50 Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:52:17 +0100 Message-ID: <2945.1187196737@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Casey Schaufler wrote: > > Could you describe how this compares to the proposal that the > AppArmor developers suggested recently? I expect that we can > reduce the amount of discussion required, and maybe avoid some > confusion if you could do that. I don't know what that is. David From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells Subject: Re: Adding a security parameter to VFS functions Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:52:17 +0100 Message-ID: <2945.1187196737@redhat.com> References: <45343.31878.qm@web36610.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, sds@tycho.nsa.gov To: casey@schaufler-ca.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <45343.31878.qm@web36610.mail.mud.yahoo.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfsv4-bounces@linux-nfs.org Errors-To: nfsv4-bounces@linux-nfs.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Casey Schaufler wrote: > > Could you describe how this compares to the proposal that the > AppArmor developers suggested recently? I expect that we can > reduce the amount of discussion required, and maybe avoid some > confusion if you could do that. I don't know what that is. David