From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] librte_cfgfile: add section num entries by
	index
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 14:42:26 +0200
Message-ID: <29473012.7NRoJTRZKy@xps>
References: <1493275900-4728-1-git-send-email-gprathyusha@caviumnetworks.com>
 <3240514.oRFImOiSkL@xps>
 <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D891267BA8770E@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Guduri Prathyusha <gprathyusha@caviumnetworks.com>
To: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58EBA9B37
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue,  1 Aug 2017 14:42:28 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D891267BA8770E@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

01/08/2017 14:36, Dumitrescu, Cristian:
> > 27/04/2017 08:51, Guduri Prathyusha:
> > > rte_cfgfile_section_num_entries_by_index() is added to get the number
> > of
> > > entries of a section when multiple sections of the same name are
> > > present.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Guduri Prathyusha <gprathyusha@caviumnetworks.com>
> > > ---
> > >  lib/librte_cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.c |   13 +++++++++++++
> > >  lib/librte_cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.h |   20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
> > 
> > Cristian, this is an old patch not reviewed.
> > Any comment please?
> 
> Do you need this reviewed for this release, or can it wait until the next release?

It has already waited 3 months without any ping, so I guess it can wait.

> I have a few patches on my list to review (librte_cfgfile, librte_sched), I will make this review a priority for next release cycle.

OK thanks.
It's not about you specifically, but as a community, we need to improve
our response time (I'm not good as well).