From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Moseley Subject: Re: use of the limiting options Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:43:55 -0800 Message-ID: <294d5daa05012610435e4160b@mail.gmail.com> References: <294d5daa0501251137328fa4ff@mail.gmail.com> <294d5daa05012511513465fcc1@mail.gmail.com> <294d5daa0501251217b1935c4@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: Mark Moseley Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org I'm guessing maybe you don't have a rule above that accepts established connections? e.g. iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 22 -m state --state ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT If you don't have that, your established connection will soon deplete the 6/hr packets as well. Though, as Jason mentioned, you probably want to poke a hole or two through for select known-good IPs.