From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1NheXh-0000VZ-DQ for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:41:53 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NheXg-0000VU-BH for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:41:52 -0500 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42120 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NheXf-0000VK-Gn for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:41:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NheXc-00041P-Jl for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:41:51 -0500 Received: from aa.81.b6.static.xlhost.com ([207.182.129.170]:35933 helo=wombat.diezmil.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NheXc-00041A-67 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:41:48 -0500 Received: from wombat (wombat [127.0.0.1]) by wombat.diezmil.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o1H7fkL4003693 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:41:47 -0500 Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:41:46 -0500 From: gburanov@gmail.com To: grub-devel@gnu.org Message-ID: <29547223.11266392506886.JavaMail.root@wombat> In-Reply-To: <4B7A8BFA.2080307@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Subject: Re: Re: [patch] GRUB possible patches X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:41:52 -0000 > First part applied Thanks! > Please don't put unrelated patches into single file. Fast look on the > joliet.c of mkisofs suggests that it's not the case for its joliet. It > seems there is more to it. Can you find some normative documents? I searched a bit and found the following information: Doc: http://www.transelectro.ru/technology/standard/joliet_spec.htm In the documentation:=20 "Simply put, SEPARATOR 1 and SEPARATOR 2 shall be expanded to 16-bits". SEPARATOR 2 is ';' - which is used signify the version number of a file. About mkisofs - it seems it's just their implementation of joilet, they can= use or not use versioning See this topic http://www.mail-archive.com/cdwrite@other.debian.org/msg03199.html > We use only C-style comments Ok, I will create new patch soon --=20 Regards Vladimir '=CF=86-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko -- This message was sent on behalf of gburanov@gmail.com at openSubscriber.com http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/grub-devel@gnu.org/13437133.html