From: Martin Knoblauch <spamtrap@knobisoft.de>
To: Gabriel C <nix.or.die@googlemail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hmh@hmh.eng.br
Subject: Re: 2.6.25.2 - Jiffies/Time jumping back and forth (Regereesion from 2.6.24)
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 07:05:05 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <295530.5900.qm@web32602.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (raw)
----- Original Message ----
> From: Gabriel C <nix.or.die@googlemail.com>
> To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Martin Knoblauch <spamtrap@knobisoft.de>; Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@gmail.com>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; hmh@hmh.eng.br
> Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2008 2:21:57 PM
> Subject: Re: 2.6.25.2 - Jiffies/Time jumping back and forth (Regereesion from 2.6.24)
>
> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 May 2008, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> >>> no this looks different. As soon as the timesource is detected, I see
> non-zero
> >>> timestamps
> >>> in dmesg, but they look smaller and jump in both directions. And I have
> never
> >>> seen this before
> >>> 2.6.25.
> >>>
> >>> It actually might be a good idea to get the dmesg output from 2.6.24.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers
> >>> Martin
> >> interesting - maybe related to clocksources. The HPET seems to be detected
> later in 2.6.25:
> >>
> >> 2.6.24:
> >>
> >> [ 0.000000] Initializing CPU#0
> >> [ 0.000000] PID hash table entries: 4096 (order: 12, 32768 bytes)
> >> -->[ 0.000000] hpet clockevent registered
> >> -->[ 0.000000] TSC calibrated against HPET
> >
> >> 2.6.25.2:
> >>
> >> [ 0.000000] Initializing CPU#0
> >> [ 0.000000] PID hash table entries: 4096 (order: 12, 32768 bytes)
> >> -->[ 0.000000] TSC calibrated against PM_TIMER
> >
> > That's odd indeed. Is HPET not registered at all in 2.6.25 or does it just
> happen late ?
> >
> > please provide the output of:
> > /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/available_clocksource
> > /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource
>
> I was about to report / ask bout this issue too.
>
> I see the same output for >=2.6.25 , TSC calibrated against PM_TIMER and not
> against HPET anymore.
>
>
> [ 0.000000] TSC calibrated against PM_TIMER
> [ 0.000016] time.c: Detected 2499.949 MHz processor.
> ...
> [ 0.000999] hpet clockevent registered
>
> So it seems to register to late in >=2.6.25 kernels ?
>
> cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/available_clocksource
> tsc hpet acpi_pm jiffies
>
> cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource
> tsc
>
>
on two different systems running 2.6.25.2:
ibm x3650(2xDualCore)
-------------------------------------
[root@lpsdm60 ~]# cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/available_clocksource
tsc hpet acpi_pm jiffies
[root@lpsdm60 ~]# cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource
tsc
HP Proliant DL-380G4 (2xSingleCore)
------------------------------------------------------------
[root@lpsdm52 ~]# cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/available_clocksource
tsc hpet acpi_pm jiffies
[root@lpsdm52 ~]# cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource
tsc
and on the DL380G4 running 2.6.24:
---------------------------------------------------------
[root@lpsdm52 ~]# cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/available_clocksource
hpet acpi_pm jiffies tsc
[root@lpsdm52 ~]# cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource
hpet
Cheers
Martin
next reply other threads:[~2008-05-08 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-08 14:05 Martin Knoblauch [this message]
2008-05-08 14:13 ` 2.6.25.2 - Jiffies/Time jumping back and forth (Regereesion from 2.6.24) Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-08 17:31 ` Mike Galbraith
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-09 15:18 Martin Knoblauch
2008-05-09 13:01 Martin Knoblauch
2008-05-09 11:32 Martin Knoblauch
2008-05-09 11:06 Martin Knoblauch
2008-05-08 16:41 Martin Knoblauch
2008-05-07 18:14 Martin Knoblauch
2008-05-07 18:59 ` John Stultz
2008-05-07 15:50 Martin Knoblauch
2008-05-08 10:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-08 12:21 ` Gabriel C
2008-05-07 15:02 Martin Knoblauch
2008-05-07 12:42 Martin Knoblauch
2008-05-07 12:56 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-05-07 13:06 ` Bart Van Assche
2008-05-07 17:07 ` john stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=295530.5900.qm@web32602.mail.mud.yahoo.com \
--to=spamtrap@knobisoft.de \
--cc=bart.vanassche@gmail.com \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nix.or.die@googlemail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.