From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753292Ab0ELMnj (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 May 2010 08:43:39 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51678 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752038Ab0ELMni (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 May 2010 08:43:38 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <1273634462-2672-9-git-send-email-walken@google.com> References: <1273634462-2672-9-git-send-email-walken@google.com> <1273634462-2672-1-git-send-email-walken@google.com> To: Michel Lespinasse Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , LKML , Andrew Morton , Mike Waychison , Suleiman Souhlal , Ying Han Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] rwsem: smaller wrappers around rwsem_down_failed_common Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 13:42:36 +0100 Message-ID: <29724.1273668156@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Michel Lespinasse wrote: > Following change also enjoys having flags available in a register rather > than having to fish it out in the struct rwsem_waiter... So what? It doesn't use flags in rwsem_down_failed_common(). David