From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 014F9C4361B for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 16:17:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F08623A02 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 16:17:17 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5F08623A02 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-erofs-bounces+linux-erofs=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Cr5174HyLzDqdd for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 03:17:15 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::143; helo=mail-lf1-x143.google.com; envelope-from=nl6720@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=Z+7nyLp1; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-lf1-x143.google.com (mail-lf1-x143.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::143]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Cr5104bdDzDqX8 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 03:17:06 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x143.google.com with SMTP id 23so11330627lfg.10 for ; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 08:17:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KENbUHbG5Po7tH9gN4CVSdbsaqN4Qn0BjJbf0mUTGJA=; b=Z+7nyLp1t6CvxaqwamLC3LshS68l5CmkQuczmc13kZr9EAe70r5NNZ6fKOVvFCau8z QsskOeeXrK1ugdkX1Fc6pilCKRMxpgzFOc/Jsseab4QFXT5VqEemSnqBc+yM57V+9Zc+ t13AHios7jGowgUWP7i6Pi64iuMcGDnyCjS2PgTdZ9bVy2SiakPu/yN/hX1OvDPctiNt 9uU0b1zeRJfa/06RSUqFSe1L74dg8+u3Z0EonrTGshMhE7wblgoqHmNxEk6sQzfuasA/ uFzN5m/+BI+JbfKuTW7joYMFtBbj72qxygXx+wr6CbyYIesxI2KnaA6R5TJ/pQ8Bv0rK hfcg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KENbUHbG5Po7tH9gN4CVSdbsaqN4Qn0BjJbf0mUTGJA=; b=Oq9wcA8nXxmuLsMsJKoEcSb8fFNxYT4w+W1I/NtPdF/VKb+/YdZ3VbkisGdCDlAJlO 1KnRDLM0I6BmOBk+vJbfyDfh85hO83H3Y2UNHVpRCJkGbSz+uAjY8tbB7t3ltXtBKfz8 k0rTdCEy+fnU6oaGEBQqtVBYYx4c+fuTXg+AnqXC4o1ZEGophE+g+1BR4VC980ydtgNb 0TYDSOgtdUTjSkLpGFr+A0ePRXq11eBT8FHVI9xCrSiz4dmtL1hAdVhb8peDBCnx5037 9d2ogBb/t+EsXmk/RGa+E9B8r9Soht3E9Tpu0VflOrL4FSXJXWq9zizLT5eW655fKLL+ j0KQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530km4hZA9jS26/uwQbEMUw01QoqJk1h9Armb4JYb5PuAPIC3K9e MfoUv6G7naOUN637plsnftk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxsn761Z5q2MGsFVUR9yfxHMhUTHaWvknWDv9QkafxzUV5YsjtRJTLFzQ2mxJGKAnbWqabYLA== X-Received: by 2002:a19:434e:: with SMTP id m14mr5526372lfj.73.1607444220662; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 08:17:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (balticom-231-46.balticom.lv. [83.99.231.46]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t12sm3438641ljk.74.2020.12.08.08.16.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 08 Dec 2020 08:16:59 -0800 (PST) From: nl6720 To: Gao Xiang , linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] erofs-utils: fix multiple definition of `sbi' Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 18:16:57 +0200 Message-ID: <29768659.UDeB2voVRW@walnut> In-Reply-To: <20201208105741.9614-1-hsiangkao@aol.com> References: <20201208105741.9614-1-hsiangkao.ref@aol.com> <20201208105741.9614-1-hsiangkao@aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Linux EROFS file system List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linux-erofs-bounces+linux-erofs=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linux-erofs" On Tuesday, 8 December 2020 12:57:41 EET Gao Xiang wrote: > As nl6720 reported [1], lib/inode.o (mkfs) and lib/super.o (erofsfuse) > could be compiled together by some options. Fix it now. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/10789285.Na0ui7I3VY@walnut > Reported-by: nl6720 > Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang > --- > Hi nl6720, > could you verify this patch? Thanks in advance! > > Thanks, > Gao Xiang This patch fixes the build issue for me. Thanks!