From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RORg6-0007aK-E3 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 11:16:14 +0100 Received: from azsmga002.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.35]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Nov 2011 02:09:59 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,488,1315206000"; d="scan'208";a="35270638" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.121.140]) by AZSMGA002.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Nov 2011 02:09:49 -0800 From: Paul Eggleton To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:47:34 +0000 Message-ID: <2977361.KIYvSC26hZ@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.7.2 (Linux/3.0.0-12-generic-pae; KDE/4.7.2; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20111110074717.GC3933@ad.chargestorm.se> References: <201111092321.33622.schnitzeltony@gmx.de> <20111110074717.GC3933@ad.chargestorm.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: systemd packages -> image X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 10:16:15 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" On Thursday 10 November 2011 08:47:17 Anders Darander wrote: > * Andreas M=FCller [111109 23:17]: > > Imagine a recipe is included into an image by a task and later gets= > > systemd- native support. > > How about forcing the packages in SYSTEMD_PACKAGES packed into imag= es in > > case > >=20 > > IMAGE_INIT_MANAGER =3D "systemd" > >=20 > > is found in the image definition? >=20 > Sure, that sounds like a nice idea. Although, in that case, SysV-init= > files should probably also be packaged in separate packages and be > installed in a similar manner. Why are we going to such an effort to provide both sysvinit and systemd= in the=20 same distro? Why not make it a distro policy decision? This would save = a huge=20 amount of work. Cheers, Paul --=20 Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre