Re: [PATCH] ixgbe: fix icc issue with mbuf initializer

[Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon-pdR9zngts4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]

2014-11-03 12:47, Bruce Richardson:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 01:31:10PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Bruce Richardson <
> > > +#ifdef RTE_MBUF_REFCNT
> > > +       mb_def.refcnt = 1;
> > > +#endif
> > 
> > I would expect we use rte_mbuf_refcnt_set / rte_mbuf_refcnt_read to access
> > this "refcnt" field.
> > This api handles both RTE_MBUF_REFCNT_ATOMIC and ! RTE_MBUF_REFCNT_ATOMIC
> > configs.
> > But I suppose this is fine at init time (since the union will initialize
> > properly the field).
> 
> It's a good point, I'll update patch to use the appropriate macro which will clean up the code a bit.

> > By the way, why do we have this RTE_MBUF_REFCNT_ATOMIC option ?
> > From my point of view, there is not much use of a refcnt that is not atomic
> > :-).

Bruce, I think it's a good question but you didn't answer.
Maybe we should remove this option to keep only atomic mode.

-- 
Thomas