From: "Jürgen Groß" <jgross@suse.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86/msr: Consolidate native/paravirt MSR functions
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 08:12:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <29e40dbb-8baf-45fa-a7e8-30c4a2cc90d4@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2c4f1284-77d2-4628-88bc-28677afd2238@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 843 bytes --]
On 31.03.26 23:41, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 3/20/26 23:23, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>> I think this should be the first step towards a MSR access
>> consolidation, as it allows any internal optimizations and changes
>> without further bothering most of the users.
> I'm not opposed to something more thorough than these 8 patches. But,
> these do fix real problems. Would they make some future effort harder?
I would need to rebase my paravirt MSR series, but this isn't a blocker.
Maybe I will need to undo some of your changes and fix the underlying
problem differently, but this is fine for me. In the end I believe your
series and the one I was proposing above wouldn't interfere a lot. It is
the layer between both (my paravirt MSR work) which would be affected
most, but this series might need more work anyway.
Juergen
[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 3743 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 495 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-01 6:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-20 19:03 [PATCH 0/8] x86/msr: Consolidate native/paravirt MSR functions Dave Hansen
2026-03-20 19:03 ` [PATCH 1/8] x86/msr: Use "raw_" names for calls to native_* functions Dave Hansen
2026-03-20 19:03 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86/msr: Consolidate rdmsr() definitions Dave Hansen
2026-03-20 19:03 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86/msr: Consolidate rdmsr_safe() implementations Dave Hansen
2026-03-20 19:03 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86/msr: Consolidate rdmsrq() implementations Dave Hansen
2026-03-20 19:03 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86/msr: Consolidate {rd,wr}msr[q]_safe() implementations Dave Hansen
2026-03-20 19:03 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86/msr: Consolidate rdpmc() implementations Dave Hansen
2026-03-20 19:03 ` [PATCH 7/8] x86/msr: Remove old crusty comment Dave Hansen
2026-03-20 19:03 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86/msr: Remove duplicate #include Dave Hansen
2026-03-20 23:33 ` [PATCH 0/8] x86/msr: Consolidate native/paravirt MSR functions Borislav Petkov
2026-03-20 23:39 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-21 6:23 ` Jürgen Groß
2026-03-23 15:22 ` Juergen Gross
2026-03-31 21:41 ` Dave Hansen
2026-04-01 6:12 ` Jürgen Groß [this message]
2026-03-31 21:37 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=29e40dbb-8baf-45fa-a7e8-30c4a2cc90d4@suse.com \
--to=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.