From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: khali@linux-fr.org (Jean Delvare) Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 11:09:43 +0000 Subject: [lm-sensors] alarm files one file per sensor vs file with Message-Id: <2JBVFTvW.1142507383.8724770.khali@localhost> List-Id: References: <441940D4.2050107@hhs.nl> In-Reply-To: <441940D4.2050107@hhs.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org On 2006-03-16, Hans de Goede wrote: > > We will go with individual alarm files, as I had been proposing. I will > > not have the time to submit a new documentation patch before next week, > > but basically it's just what my previous patch was saying. Follow the > > same naming scheme for beep, alarm_mask and shutdown (the later two > > being only used by your driver AFAIK.) > > Ok, got a link handy to the patch you're talking about? Otherwise I'll > scim the archives. This post: http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2006-March/015502.html Or you can get the patch file directly from here: http://khali.linux-fr.org/devel/i2c/linux-2.6/hwmon-sysfs-interface-individual-alarm-files.patch -- Jean Delvare