From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: kuniyu@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+ff020673c5e3d94d9478@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mptcp@lists.linux.dev,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [mptcp?] KMSAN: uninit-value in mptcp_established_options
Date: Thu, 7 May 2026 09:44:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a9bde65-d2de-44cc-9192-e7aa8a0935a7@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69f8e352.170a0220.bb392.0005.GAE@google.com>
Hi Paolo, Kuniyuki,
On 04/05/2026 20:20, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer is still triggering an issue:
> KMSAN: uninit-value in irqentry_exit_to_kernel_mode_preempt
It looks like the issue is different now:
> =====================================================
> BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in irqentry_exit_to_kernel_mode_preempt+0xb0/0xc0 include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:472
> irqentry_exit_to_kernel_mode_preempt+0xb0/0xc0 include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:472
> irqentry_exit_to_kernel_mode include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:547 [inline]
> irqentry_exit+0x7b/0x760 kernel/entry/common.c:164
> sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x52/0x90 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1061
> asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:697
> kmsan_get_metadata+0x17/0x160 mm/kmsan/shadow.c:125
> kmsan_get_shadow_origin_ptr+0x4a/0xb0 mm/kmsan/shadow.c:102
> get_shadow_origin_ptr mm/kmsan/instrumentation.c:38 [inline]
> __msan_metadata_ptr_for_load_4+0x24/0x40 mm/kmsan/instrumentation.c:93
> tcp_data_queue+0xdc/0x7c90 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:5589
> tcp_rcv_established+0x19bb/0x3200 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6656
> tcp_v4_do_rcv+0xc4b/0x1b10 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1852
> sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1190 [inline]
That's the input side.
> __release_sock+0x360/0x7d0 net/core/sock.c:3216
> release_sock+0x22d/0x300 net/core/sock.c:3815
> mptcp_subflow_shutdown+0x358/0x690 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3144
> mptcp_check_send_data_fin+0x31b/0x3d0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3218
> __mptcp_wr_shutdown net/mptcp/protocol.c:3234 [inline]
> __mptcp_close+0x860/0x1360 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3313
> mptcp_close+0x42/0x260 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3367
> inet_release+0x1ee/0x2a0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:442
> __sock_release net/socket.c:722 [inline]
> sock_close+0xd6/0x2f0 net/socket.c:1514
> __fput+0x60e/0x1010 fs/file_table.c:510
> ____fput+0x25/0x30 fs/file_table.c:538
> task_work_run+0x208/0x2b0 kernel/task_work.c:233
> resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:50 [inline]
> __exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:67 [inline]
> exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x306/0x1b60 kernel/entry/common.c:98
> __exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:207 [inline]
> syscall_exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:238 [inline]
> syscall_exit_to_user_mode include/linux/entry-common.h:318 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x236/0xf80 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:100
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>
> Local variable mp_opt created at:
> mptcp_incoming_options+0x11d/0x43b0 net/mptcp/options.c:1171
Confirmed here. With "struct mptcp_options_received" while the original
issue was with "struct mptcp_out_options".
Plus I'm not exactly sure to understand the issue here: mp_opt is
defined and used only in mptcp_incoming_options(), and I don't see
anything using it after the end of this function. Or did I miss something?
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-07 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-01 6:15 [syzbot] [mptcp?] KMSAN: uninit-value in mptcp_established_options syzbot
2026-05-03 13:01 ` syzbot
2026-05-04 9:51 ` [PATCH] mptcp: fix " Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-05-04 9:59 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-05-04 11:14 ` [syzbot] [mptcp?] " syzbot
2026-05-04 16:22 ` [PATCH] mptcp: fix " Paolo Abeni
2026-05-04 17:14 ` [syzbot] [mptcp?] " syzbot
2026-05-04 17:31 ` [PATCH] mptcp: fix " Paolo Abeni
2026-05-04 18:20 ` [syzbot] [mptcp?] " syzbot
2026-05-07 7:44 ` Matthieu Baerts [this message]
2026-05-08 9:27 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-05-08 10:11 ` Alexander Potapenko
2026-05-08 10:46 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-05-12 8:55 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-05-12 9:31 ` Alexander Potapenko
2026-05-12 13:22 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-05-12 10:08 ` syzbot
2026-05-04 11:02 ` [PATCH] mptcp: fix " MPTCP CI
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2a9bde65-d2de-44cc-9192-e7aa8a0935a7@kernel.org \
--to=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=syzbot+ff020673c5e3d94d9478@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.