From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E0F7C352A1 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 03:43:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229744AbiLGDno convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2022 22:43:44 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35072 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229513AbiLGDnm (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2022 22:43:42 -0500 Received: from rtits2.realtek.com.tw (rtits2.realtek.com [211.75.126.72]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24DDAB57; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 19:43:41 -0800 (PST) Authenticated-By: X-SpamFilter-By: ArmorX SpamTrap 5.77 with qID 2B73gUfqD027835, This message is accepted by code: ctloc85258 Received: from mail.realtek.com (rtexh36505.realtek.com.tw[172.21.6.25]) by rtits2.realtek.com.tw (8.15.2/2.81/5.90) with ESMTPS id 2B73gUfqD027835 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 7 Dec 2022 11:42:30 +0800 Received: from RTEXMBS06.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.99) by RTEXH36505.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.32; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 11:43:17 +0800 Received: from RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.97) by RTEXMBS06.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.34; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 11:43:17 +0800 Received: from RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw ([fe80::15b5:fc4b:72f3:424b]) by RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw ([fe80::15b5:fc4b:72f3:424b%5]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.007; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 11:43:17 +0800 From: Ping-Ke Shih To: Jun ASAKA , "Jes.Sorensen@gmail.com" CC: "kvalo@kernel.org" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "edumazet@google.com" , "kuba@kernel.org" , "pabeni@redhat.com" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: RE: [PATCH v5] wifi: rtl8xxxu: fixing IQK failures for rtl8192eu Thread-Topic: [PATCH v5] wifi: rtl8xxxu: fixing IQK failures for rtl8192eu Thread-Index: AQHZCe2b+2Cm8cdsR0GFzEgG7Xr+X65hx/Zw Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 03:43:17 +0000 Message-ID: <2ac07b1d6e06443b95befb79d27549d2@realtek.com> References: <20221207033926.11777-1-JunASAKA@zzy040330.moe> In-Reply-To: <20221207033926.11777-1-JunASAKA@zzy040330.moe> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-TW Content-Language: zh-TW X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.21.69.188] x-kse-serverinfo: RTEXMBS06.realtek.com.tw, 9 x-kse-attachmentfiltering-interceptor-info: no applicable attachment filtering rules found x-kse-antivirus-interceptor-info: scan successful x-kse-antivirus-info: =?us-ascii?Q?Clean,_bases:_2022/12/7_=3F=3F_01:28:00?= x-kse-bulkmessagesfiltering-scan-result: protection disabled Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-KSE-ServerInfo: RTEXH36505.realtek.com.tw, 9 X-KSE-Attachment-Filter-Triggered-Rules: Clean X-KSE-Attachment-Filter-Triggered-Filters: Clean X-KSE-BulkMessagesFiltering-Scan-Result: protection disabled Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Jun ASAKA > Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 11:39 AM > To: Jes.Sorensen@gmail.com > Cc: kvalo@kernel.org; davem@davemloft.net; edumazet@google.com; kuba@kernel.org; pabeni@redhat.com; > linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Jun ASAKA > ; Ping-Ke Shih > Subject: [PATCH v5] wifi: rtl8xxxu: fixing IQK failures for rtl8192eu > > Fixing "Path A RX IQK failed" and "Path B RX IQK failed" > issues for rtl8192eu chips by replacing the arguments with > the ones in the updated official driver as shown below. > 1. https://github.com/Mange/rtl8192eu-linux-driver > 2. vendor driver version: 5.6.4 > > Tested-by: Jun ASAKA > Signed-off-by: Jun ASAKA > Reviewed-by: Ping-Ke Shih > --- > v5: > - no modification. Then, why do you need v5? > v4: > - fixed some mistakes. > v3: > - add detailed info about the newer version this patch used. > - no functional update. > --- > --- [...]