From: "Jürgen Groß" <jgross@suse.com>
To: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
osstest service owner <osstest-admin@xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 143061: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 15:32:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2acc6846-0a39-5a87-e975-85c3f5822193@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23985.38270.959448.768068@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
On 24.10.19 14:13, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Jürgen Groß writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 143061: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass"):
>> On 24.10.19 12:48, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> There is a known bug with two of our arm64 boxes, where they lose some
>>> of the output during boot. This is not important for operational use
>>> of those boxes in a normal context, but in our context being able to
>>> get all the boot messages is important for debugging hypervisors and
>>> kernels, so osstest has a test that this works properly. It is that
>>> test that fails.
>>>
>>> If this is the only failure, we should force push.
>>
>> Agreed. Can you do so, please?
>
> But it isn't in this flight.
Oh, sorry, then I misunderstood you. I thought the italia1 failure
would be regarded as non-blocking due to obvious hardware problem.
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm
> didn't run because of the problem with italia1. Force pushing would
> be saying we don't mind about that.
Lets wait for the next run then.
Juergen
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-24 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-24 6:47 [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 143061: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass osstest service owner
2019-10-24 7:13 ` Jürgen Groß
2019-10-24 7:28 ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-10-24 10:45 ` [Xen-devel] italia1 " Ian Jackson
2019-10-25 15:59 ` [Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 143128: " osstest service owner
2019-10-25 16:14 ` [Xen-devel] italia1 Re: [xen-unstable test] 143061: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass [and 1 more messages] Ian Jackson
2019-10-24 8:46 ` [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 143061: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass Julien Grall
2019-10-24 18:24 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-10-30 16:24 ` [Xen-devel] rochester boot loader serial output issue (was Re: [xen-unstable test] 143061: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass) Ian Jackson
2019-10-24 10:48 ` [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 143061: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass Ian Jackson
2019-10-24 10:50 ` Jürgen Groß
2019-10-24 12:13 ` Ian Jackson
2019-10-24 13:32 ` Jürgen Groß [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2acc6846-0a39-5a87-e975-85c3f5822193@suse.com \
--to=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@citrix.com \
--cc=osstest-admin@xenproject.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.