From: "Di, ChenxuX" <chenxux.di@intel.com>
To: "Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
"hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
Cc: "sachin.saxena@nxp.com" <sachin.saxena@nxp.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/dpaa2: fix build error about timesync functions
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 02:03:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ada3c33bf2b4dcf862e6fa4e6a97cbc@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <974e79a6-6a52-c84c-6ae2-cf802e551444@intel.com>
Hi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 11:29 PM
> To: Di, ChenxuX <chenxux.di@intel.com>; hemant.agrawal@nxp.com
> Cc: sachin.saxena@nxp.com; stable@dpdk.org; dev@dpdk.org; Richardson,
> Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/dpaa2: fix build error about timesync
> functions
>
> On 9/15/2020 3:40 AM, Chenxu Di wrote:
> > When the build option has '-DRTE_LIBRTE_IEEE1588=1', the announce of
> > timesync functions will be build.
> > However the dpdk_conf doesn't hav RTE_LIBRTE_IEEE1588 so that the file
> > dpaa2_ptp.c will not be build.
> > It cause the build error.
> > This patch fixes it by adding set for dpdk_conf.
> >
> > Fixes: 184c39d16568 ("net/dpaa2: add DPRTC sub-module")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chenxu Di <chenxux.di@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/dpaa2/meson.build | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/dpaa2/meson.build
> > b/drivers/net/dpaa2/meson.build index 6dd0eb274..d9aadfdae 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/dpaa2/meson.build
> > +++ b/drivers/net/dpaa2/meson.build
> > @@ -17,6 +17,10 @@ sources = files('base/dpaa2_hw_dpni.c',
> > 'mc/dpdmux.c',
> > 'mc/dpni.c')
> >
> > +if '-DRTE_LIBRTE_IEEE1588=1' in get_option('c_args')
>
> The "RTE_LIBRTE_IEEE1588=1" can fail,
> all places looking for "#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_IEEE1588", so a "-Dc_args=-
> DRTE_LIBRTE_IEEE1588" is more likely, but why not "-Dc_args=-
> DRTE_LIBRTE_IEEE1588=666"
>
Yes, I will change it
> > + dpdk_conf.set('RTE_LIBRTE_IEEE1588', 1) endif
> > +
> > if dpdk_conf.has('RTE_LIBRTE_IEEE1588')
> > sources += files('mc/dprtc.c')
> > sources += files('dpaa2_ptp.c')
> >
>
> Can't we just remove the conditional build:
>
> -if dpdk_conf.has('RTE_LIBRTE_IEEE1588')
> - sources += files('mc/dprtc.c')
> - sources += files('dpaa2_ptp.c')
> -endif
> +sources += files('mc/dprtc.c')
> +sources += files('dpaa2_ptp.c')
The announce of timesync functions are in the #define DRTE_LIBRTE_IEEE1588
While the define of the functions are in the file 'dpaa2_ptp.c'.
So they should be both build or not build by whether the build option -DRTE_LIBRTE_IEEE1588=1 or not.
So it seems not a good idea that remove the conditional.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-17 2:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-15 2:40 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/dpaa2: fix build error about timesync functions Chenxu Di
2020-09-15 3:22 ` Hemant Agrawal
2020-09-16 5:12 ` Zhou, JunX W
2020-09-16 15:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
2020-09-17 2:03 ` Di, ChenxuX [this message]
2020-09-17 11:38 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-09-17 11:50 ` Hemant Agrawal
2020-09-17 11:59 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-09-17 15:40 ` Hemant Agrawal
2020-09-30 15:09 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-09-17 8:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Chenxu Di
2020-09-17 11:48 ` Hemant Agrawal
2020-10-06 17:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-08 2:24 ` Sachin Saxena (OSS)
2020-10-08 13:12 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-09 7:48 ` Sachin Saxena (OSS)
2020-10-09 11:22 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2ada3c33bf2b4dcf862e6fa4e6a97cbc@intel.com \
--to=chenxux.di@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=sachin.saxena@nxp.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.