Re: [meta-java] host gcc-9, icetea-7 gcc-9 but how older gcc versions?

["Robert Berger" <robert.berger.oe.devel@gmail.com>]

Hi,

Please see my comments in-line.

On 01/05/2020 00:13, Richard Leitner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 06:43:46PM +0300, Robert Berger wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is this supposed to work with host gcc 9?
> 
> Yes, for me it works with "gcc (GCC) 9.3.1 20200408 (Red Hat 9.3.1-2)"

Hmm for gcc (Ubuntu 9.2.1-17ubuntu1~16.04) 9.2.1 20191102

it needs additional CFLAGS.

Do we really need to distinguish also Distros and/or 9.3 vs. 9.2??

Does it do any harm if you add this?

https://github.com/RobertBerger/meta-java/commit/3db52ddcb7771e989cf39048a7b084d040d6b5b0

> 
>>
>> This was the first test I did and it bombed.
>>
>> I used all upstream unmodified dunfell branches plus your branch.
> 
> same did I on my Fedora box and it built and succeeded tests... That's
> strange.
> 
> Have you a clean build?

Yes all fresh and also no SSTATE or SSTATE cache.

If you would like to reproduce the problem I can provide you with ssh 
access to my build environment to show you quickly.

The build docker container I use is this one:

https://hub.docker.com/r/reliableembeddedsystems/poky-container/tags

Tag: ubuntu-16.04-gcc-9

Also I believe it can be easily reproduced with a "dirty" build as well, 
if I remove my 2 lines and just build icedtea-native.

> 
> regards;rl
> 
>> Regards,
>>
>> Robert
>>

Regards,

Robert