From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: guenther@tum.de (Stephan =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=BCnther?=) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 21:05:14 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2] nvme: temporary fix for Apple controller reset In-Reply-To: <565DFB7F.6000807@kernel.dk> References: <781f695dc3cedc678faf29070a6f6bf5@localhost> <9cc23b98072a89f0f469f528f6e8f74e@localhost> <565DFB7F.6000807@kernel.dk> Message-ID: <2b5655ec98dda469696608bf34344e5a@localhost> On 2015/December/01 12:56, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 12/01/2015 12:46 PM, Stephan G?nther wrote: > >The patch below has been reviewed by Christoph and reported to work. > >However, there is still no sign that it will be applied to linux-4.4. > > > >Please either undo commit c74dc7801d515d01847fd5cf2b472489fa5717b1, > >which added the PCI ID of the Apple controller, or merge the patch below > >asap. > > > > > >Currently, the driver will make that controller destroy data! > > Honestly, I'd rather revert the pci id addition, unless there's conclusive > evidence that limiting the (per queue) depth to 2 really does fix the issue. Wes Cilldhaire tested the patch (his answer is in that thread) - as I did the past 3 weeks ago as I'm running solely Linux on that broken MacBook. > Is this what the OSX driver does? What testing was done to ascertain that 2 > is the magic number? Does it just make it harder to hit, or does it really > fix it? I do not know what the OSX driver does. Apple is of absolutely no help whatsoever. But without that patch `mkfs btrfs` immediately fails. Even `partprobe /dev/nvme0n1` will reset the controller (the latter one without data loss). As I am running a btrfs on a luks container for 3 weeks with that patch, it *does* work. Performance is, obviously, not the best one I have seen. But given the circumstances I cannot complain at all. So again: please either revert the previous patch and leave it to the more interested individuals to try it (probably slowing down Linux support for that MacBook as not detecting the hard-soldered disk is quite a blocker), or merge that hotfix until we find a better solution. With 4.5 that may even become a quirk. Best, Stephan