Re: [PATCH] hugetlbfs: rework calculation code of Hugepage size in hugetlbfs_show_options()

[David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>]

On 01.02.21 09:23, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> Rework calculation code of the Hugepage size to make it more readable and
> straightforward.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
> ---
>   fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c | 9 +++++----
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> index 3a08fbae3b53..1be18de4b537 100644
> --- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> @@ -1014,11 +1014,12 @@ static int hugetlbfs_show_options(struct seq_file *m, struct dentry *root)
>   	if (sbinfo->max_inodes != -1)
>   		seq_printf(m, ",nr_inodes=%lu", sbinfo->max_inodes);
>   
> -	hpage_size /= 1024;
> -	mod = 'K';
> -	if (hpage_size >= 1024) {
> -		hpage_size /= 1024;
> +	if (hpage_size >= SZ_1M) {
> +		hpage_size /= SZ_1M;
>   		mod = 'M';
> +	} else {
> +		hpage_size /= SZ_1K;
> +		mod = 'K';
>   	}
>   	seq_printf(m, ",pagesize=%lu%c", hpage_size, mod);
>   	if (spool) {
> 

Looks correct but I am not convinced the old code was that complicated 
to understand.

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb