Re: Regression when booting 5.15 as dom0 on arm64 (WAS: Re: [linux-linus test] 161829: regressions - FAIL)

From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	osstest service owner <osstest-admin@xenproject.org>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: Regression when booting 5.15 as dom0 on arm64 (WAS: Re: [linux-linus test] 161829: regressions - FAIL)
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 12:04:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c19af0b-e4c1-4f57-19cd-a86b4dc18c35@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8b851596-acf7-9d3b-b08a-848cae5adada@xen.org>


On 5/10/2021 11:15 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
> 
> On 10/05/2021 09:40, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 12:32:37AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> The pointer dereferenced seems to suggest that the swiotlb hasn't been
>>> allocated. From what I can tell, this may be because swiotlb_force is
>>> set
>>> to SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE, we will still enable the swiotlb when running on
>>> top
>>> of Xen.
>>>
>>> I am not entirely sure what would be the correct fix. Any opinions?
>>
>> Can you try something like the patch below (not even compile tested, but
>> the intent should be obvious?
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
>> index 16a2b2b1c54d..7671bc153fb1 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
>> @@ -44,6 +44,8 @@
>>   #include <asm/tlb.h>
>>   #include <asm/alternative.h>
>>   +#include <xen/arm/swiotlb-xen.h>
>> +
>>   /*
>>    * We need to be able to catch inadvertent references to memstart_addr
>>    * that occur (potentially in generic code) before
>> arm64_memblock_init()
>> @@ -482,7 +484,7 @@ void __init mem_init(void)
>>       if (swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_FORCE ||
>>           max_pfn > PFN_DOWN(arm64_dma_phys_limit))
>>           swiotlb_init(1);
>> -    else
>> +    else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XEN) || !xen_swiotlb_detect())
>>           swiotlb_force = SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE;
>>         set_max_mapnr(max_pfn - PHYS_PFN_OFFSET);
> 
> I have applied the patch on top of 5.13-rc1 and can confirm I am able to
> boot dom0. Are you going to submit the patch?

Sorry about that Julien and thanks Christoph!
-- 
Florian
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu