All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Nanzhe Zhao <zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Juan Yescas <jyescas@google.com>,
	Dev Jain <Dev.Jain@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Hildenbrand <David.Hildenbrand@arm.com>,
	Bo Zhang <zhangbo56@xiaomi.com>,
	Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>,
	Nanzhe Zhao <nzzhao@126.com>, Pengfei Li <lipengfei28@xiaomi.com>,
	Ryan Roberts <Ryan.Roberts@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 05/14] f2fs: support large folio writeback
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 11:48:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c9b0602-88af-4759-b253-d1db87e52499@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260915041909.2903887-6-zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>

On 9/15/26 12:19, Nanzhe Zhao wrote:
> Large folio can contain multiple dirty ranges.
> Add a folio-based writeback path for large-folio mapping files
> and keep the legacy f2fs_write_cache_pages() path unchanged for
> non large-folio mapping files.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nanzhe Zhao <zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/data.c | 412 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 407 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index eb5fb8e52851..1f9c99689f38 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -355,7 +355,9 @@ static void f2fs_write_end_bio(struct bio *bio)
>  
>  	bio_for_each_folio_all(fi, bio) {
>  		struct folio *folio = fi.folio;
> +		unsigned int nr_pages = fi.length >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  		enum count_type type;
> +		bool finished = true;
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_FS_COMPRESSION
>  		if (f2fs_is_compressed_page(folio)) {
> @@ -379,10 +381,19 @@ static void f2fs_write_end_bio(struct bio *bio)
>  				folio->index, NODE_TYPE_REGULAR, true);
>  			f2fs_bug_on(sbi, folio->index != nid_of_node(sbi, folio));
>  		}
> +		if (f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio)) {
> +			struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs =
> +				(struct f2fs_folio_state *)folio->private;
> +
> +			finished = atomic_sub_and_test(nr_pages,
> +					&ffs->write_pages_pending);
> +		}
> +
>  		if (f2fs_in_warm_node_list(sbi, folio))
>  			f2fs_del_fsync_node_entry(sbi, folio);
>  
> -		dec_page_count(sbi, type);
> +		while (nr_pages--)
> +			dec_page_count(sbi, type);
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * we should access sbi before folio_end_writeback() to
> @@ -392,8 +403,10 @@ static void f2fs_write_end_bio(struct bio *bio)
>  				wq_has_sleeper(&sbi->cp_wait))
>  			wake_up(&sbi->cp_wait);
>  
> -		folio_clear_f2fs_gcing(folio);
> -		folio_end_writeback(folio);
> +		if (finished) {
> +			folio_clear_f2fs_gcing(folio);
> +			folio_end_writeback(folio);
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	bio_put(bio);
> @@ -2654,7 +2667,7 @@ static void f2fs_ffs_mark_subrange_uptodate(struct folio *folio, size_t offset,
>  		folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
>  }
>  
> -static void f2fs_ffs_mark_subrange_dirty(struct folio *folio,
> +void f2fs_ffs_mark_subrange_dirty(struct folio *folio,
>  				    size_t offset, size_t len)
>  {
>  	struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs;
> @@ -2677,6 +2690,99 @@ static void f2fs_ffs_mark_subrange_dirty(struct folio *folio,
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ffs->state_lock, flags);
>  }
>  
> +static bool __ffs_clear_subrange_dirty(struct folio *folio,
> +			struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs, size_t offset, size_t len)
> +{
> +	unsigned int nr_subpages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> +	unsigned int start, end;
> +
> +	start = offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	end = (offset + len + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	end = min(end, nr_subpages);
> +
> +	bitmap_clear(ffs->state, nr_subpages + start, end - start);
> +	return find_next_bit(ffs->state, 2 * nr_subpages, nr_subpages) <
> +			2 * nr_subpages;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * f2fs_ffs_clear_subrange_dirty_and_test - clear dirty bits and test remaining
> + * @folio: the large folio
> + * @offset: start byte offset within the folio
> + * @len: byte length of the subrange
> + *
> + * Clear the dirty bits of the 4K subpages covered by [offset, offset + len),
> + * and return whether the folio still has any dirty subpage left.
> + */
> +bool f2fs_ffs_clear_subrange_dirty_and_test(struct folio *folio, size_t offset,
> +					    size_t len)
> +{
> +	struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	bool dirty;
> +
> +	if (!f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	ffs = (struct f2fs_folio_state *)folio->private;
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&ffs->state_lock, flags);
> +	dirty = __ffs_clear_subrange_dirty(folio, ffs, offset, len);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ffs->state_lock, flags);
> +
> +	return dirty;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int ffs_next_dirty_subpage(struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs,
> +			const struct folio *folio, unsigned int start,
> +			unsigned int end)
> +{
> +	unsigned int nr_subpages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> +
> +	return find_next_bit(ffs->state, nr_subpages + end + 1,
> +			nr_subpages + start) - nr_subpages;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int ffs_next_clean_subpage(struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs,
> +			const struct folio *folio, unsigned int start,
> +			unsigned int end)
> +{
> +	unsigned int nr_subpages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> +
> +	return find_next_zero_bit(ffs->state, nr_subpages + end + 1,
> +			nr_subpages + start) - nr_subpages;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int ffs_find_dirty_range(struct folio *folio,
> +					u64 *range_start, u64 range_end)
> +{
> +	struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs;
> +	unsigned int start, end, nr_pages;
> +
> +	if (*range_start >= range_end)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (!f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio))
> +		return range_end - *range_start;
> +
> +	ffs = (struct f2fs_folio_state *)folio->private;
> +	start = offset_in_folio(folio, *range_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	end = DIV_ROUND_UP(min_not_zero(offset_in_folio(folio, range_end),
> +					folio_size(folio)), PAGE_SIZE) - 1;
> +
> +	start = ffs_next_dirty_subpage(ffs, folio, start, end);
> +	if (start > end)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (start == end)
> +		nr_pages = 1;
> +	else
> +		nr_pages = ffs_next_clean_subpage(ffs, folio,
> +						 start + 1, end) - start;
> +
> +	*range_start = folio_pos(folio) + ((u64)start << PAGE_SHIFT);
> +	return (u64)nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +}
> +
>  static bool find_next_valid_block(const struct folio *folio,
>  				  size_t orig_off, size_t *need_off,
>  				  size_t len)
> @@ -3256,6 +3362,133 @@ int f2fs_do_write_data_page(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  	return err;
>  }
>  
> +static int f2fs_write_single_data_folio(struct folio *folio, int *submitted,
> +					struct writeback_control *wbc,
> +					enum iostat_type io_type,
> +					u64 *pos, u64 len)
> +{
> +	struct inode *inode = folio->mapping->host;
> +	struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
> +	bool atomic_commit = f2fs_is_atomic_file(inode) &&
> +				folio_test_f2fs_atomic(folio);
> +	struct inode *dn_inode = atomic_commit ?
> +				F2FS_I(inode)->cow_inode : inode;
> +	struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs = NULL;
> +	u64 folio_start = folio_pos(folio);
> +	pgoff_t start_idx = (*pos - folio_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	pgoff_t end_idx = (*pos - folio_start + len - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	for (pgoff_t i = start_idx; i <= end_idx && !err; i++) {
> +		struct dnode_of_data dn;
> +		struct node_info ni;
> +		pgoff_t data_idx = folio->index + i;
> +		bool ipu_force = false;
> +		bool dn_held = false;
> +		bool submitted_blk = false;
> +		struct f2fs_io_info fio = {
> +			.sbi = sbi,
> +			.ino = inode->i_ino,
> +			.type = DATA,
> +			.op = REQ_OP_WRITE,
> +			.op_flags = wbc_to_write_flags(wbc),
> +			.old_blkaddr = NULL_ADDR,
> +			.folio = folio,
> +			.folio_offset = i,
> +			.folio_blkcnt = 1,
> +			.encrypted_page = NULL,
> +			.submitted = 0,
> +			.need_lock = LOCK_DONE,
> +			.meta_gc = f2fs_meta_inode_gc_required(inode) ? 1 : 0,
> +			.io_type = io_type,
> +			.io_wbc = wbc,
> +		};
> +
> +		if (f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio)) {
> +			ffs = (struct f2fs_folio_state *)folio->private;
> +			atomic_inc(&ffs->write_pages_pending);
> +		}
> +
> +		set_new_dnode(&dn, dn_inode, NULL, NULL, 0);
> +
> +		if (need_inplace_update(&fio) &&
> +		    f2fs_lookup_read_extent_cache_block(inode, data_idx,
> +							&fio.old_blkaddr)) {
> +			if (!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, fio.old_blkaddr,
> +						   DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE)) {
> +				err = -EFSCORRUPTED;
> +				goto block_done;
> +			}
> +			ipu_force = true;
> +			goto got_it;
> +		}
> +
> +		err = f2fs_get_dnode_of_data(&dn, data_idx, LOOKUP_NODE);
> +		if (err)
> +			goto block_done;
> +		dn_held = true;
> +
> +		fio.old_blkaddr = dn.data_blkaddr;
> +
> +got_it:
> +		if (__is_valid_data_blkaddr(fio.old_blkaddr) &&
> +		    !f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, fio.old_blkaddr,
> +					   DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE)) {
> +			err = -EFSCORRUPTED;
> +			goto block_done;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (fio.meta_gc)
> +			f2fs_wait_on_block_writeback(inode, fio.old_blkaddr);
> +
> +		if (ipu_force ||
> +		    (__is_valid_data_blkaddr(fio.old_blkaddr) &&
> +					    need_inplace_update(&fio))) {
> +			f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);

dn_held = false;

> +			err = f2fs_inplace_write_data(&fio);
> +			trace_f2fs_do_write_data_page(folio, IPU);
> +			if (err)
> +				goto block_done;
> +
> +			if (submitted)
> +				(*submitted)++;
> +			submitted_blk = true;
> +			set_inode_flag(inode, FI_UPDATE_WRITE);
> +			goto block_done;
> +		}
> +
> +		err = f2fs_get_node_info(sbi, dn.nid, &ni, false);
> +		if (err)
> +			goto block_done;
> +
> +		fio.version = ni.version;
> +
> +		f2fs_outplace_write_data(&dn, &fio);
> +		if (submitted)
> +			(*submitted)++;
> +		submitted_blk = true;
> +		set_inode_flag(inode, FI_APPEND_WRITE);
> +		trace_f2fs_do_write_data_page(folio, OPU);
> +		goto block_done;

Redundant "goto block_done;"?

> +block_done:
> +		if (dn_held)
> +			f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
> +		if (!submitted_blk && ffs)
> +			atomic_dec(&ffs->write_pages_pending);
> +		if (!err) {
> +			*pos = (data_idx + 1) << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +			spin_lock(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_size_lock);
> +			if (F2FS_I(inode)->last_disk_size < *pos)
> +				F2FS_I(inode)->last_disk_size = *pos;
> +			spin_unlock(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_size_lock);
> +		} else {
> +			file_set_keep_isize(inode);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
>  int f2fs_write_single_data_page(struct folio *folio, int *submitted,
>  				struct bio **bio,
>  				sector_t *last_block,
> @@ -3705,6 +3938,172 @@ static int f2fs_write_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int f2fs_write_cache_folios(struct address_space *mapping,
> +				   struct writeback_control *wbc,
> +				   enum iostat_type io_type)
> +{
> +	struct folio *folio = NULL;
> +	struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
> +	struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
> +	struct f2fs_lock_context lc;
> +	u64 pos = 0;
> +	u64 end_pos = 0;
> +	u32 r_len = 0;
> +	int err = 0;
> +	int submitted = 0;
> +	int nwritten = 0;
> +	bool op_locked = false;
> +	bool next = false;
> +	bool retry = false;
> +
> +	if (get_dirty_pages(inode) <= SM_I(sbi)->min_hot_blocks)
> +		set_inode_flag(inode, FI_HOT_DATA);
> +	else
> +		clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_HOT_DATA);
> +
> +	while ((folio = writeback_iter(mapping, wbc, folio, &err))) {
> +		struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs = NULL;
> +		u64 isize;
> +		size_t poff;
> +		pgoff_t end_index;
> +		bool verity_in_progress;
> +		int folio_submitted = 0;
> +		bool bias_added = false;
> +
> +		submitted = 0;
> +		next = true;
> +		retry = false;
> +
> +		if (atomic_read(&sbi->wb_sync_req[DATA]) &&
> +		    wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
> +			folio_redirty_for_writepage(wbc, folio);
> +			next = false;
> +			goto retry_out;
> +		}
> +retry:
> +		pos = folio_pos(folio);
> +		end_pos = pos + folio_size(folio);
> +		isize = i_size_read(inode);
> +		verity_in_progress = f2fs_verity_in_progress(inode);
> +		poff = 0;
> +		end_index = 0;
> +
> +		if (retry) {
> +
> +			if (unlikely(folio->mapping != mapping))
> +				goto retry_out;
> +
> +			if (!folio_test_dirty(folio))
> +				goto retry_out;
> +
> +			if (folio_test_writeback(folio)) {
> +				if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE)
> +					goto retry_out;
> +				f2fs_folio_wait_writeback(folio, DATA, true, true);
> +			}
> +
> +			if (!folio_clear_dirty_for_io(folio))
> +				goto retry_out;
> +		}
> +
> +		/* To avoid dealing with the complexity for one subrange is in bio
> +		 * while we trylock_op failed before writing another subrange.
> +		 * Try to lock_op before any subrange write for the folio.
> +		 */
> +		if (!op_locked) {
> +			if (!f2fs_trylock_op(sbi, &lc)) {
> +				folio_redirty_for_writepage(wbc, folio);
> +				err = 0;
> +				if (wbc->sync_mode != WB_SYNC_ALL)
> +					goto retry_out;
> +
> +				retry = true;
> +				folio_unlock(folio);
> +				f2fs_io_schedule_timeout(DEFAULT_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
> +				folio_lock(folio);
> +				goto retry;
> +			}
> +			op_locked = true;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (!verity_in_progress) {
> +			poff = offset_in_folio(folio, isize);
> +			end_index = isize >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +
> +			if (folio->index > end_index ||
> +			    (folio->index == end_index && poff == 0))
> +				goto out;
> +
> +			if (end_pos > isize) {
> +				folio_zero_segment(folio, poff, folio_size(folio));
> +				end_pos = isize;
> +			}
> +		}
> +
> +		folio_start_writeback(folio);
> +
> +		if (!bias_added && f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio)) {
> +			ffs = (struct f2fs_folio_state *)folio->private;
> +			WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&ffs->write_pages_pending) != 0);
> +			atomic_inc(&ffs->write_pages_pending);
> +			bias_added = true;
> +		}
> +
> +		while ((r_len = ffs_find_dirty_range(folio, &pos, end_pos))) {
> +			err = f2fs_write_single_data_folio(folio, &submitted,
> +					wbc, io_type, &pos, r_len);
> +			folio_submitted += submitted;
> +			if (err)
> +				goto out;
> +
> +			nwritten += submitted;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (!err && folio_submitted &&
> +		    f2fs_is_atomic_file(inode) &&
> +		    folio_test_f2fs_atomic(folio))
> +			folio_clear_f2fs_atomic(folio);
> +
> +out:
> +		/*
> +		 * Clear the dirty state of the subranges that were written back.
> +		 * If some subranges are still dirty (e.g. the folio was only
> +		 * partially written back), the folio must stay dirty so that
> +		 * the remaining subranges are written back later.
> +		 */
> +		if (f2fs_ffs_clear_subrange_dirty_and_test(folio, 0,
> +					(err ? pos : end_pos) - folio_pos(folio)))
> +			folio_redirty_for_writepage(wbc, folio);
> +		else
> +			inode_dec_dirty_pages(inode);
> +
> +		if (bias_added) {
> +			if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ffs->write_pages_pending))
> +				folio_end_writeback(folio);
> +		} else if (!folio_submitted && folio_test_writeback(folio)) {
> +			folio_end_writeback(folio);
> +		}
> +
> +retry_out:
> +		if (folio_test_locked(folio))

Any case the folio is unlocked?

> +			folio_unlock(folio);
> +
> +		if (op_locked) {
> +			f2fs_unlock_op(sbi, &lc);
> +			op_locked = false;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (err || !next)
> +			break;

We can not break writeback_iter() loop directly? it may cause reference leak on folio?
IIUC, the right way is pass err to writeback_iter() to break the loop?

Thanks,

> +	}
> +
> +	if (nwritten)
> +		f2fs_submit_merged_write_cond(F2FS_M_SB(mapping), mapping->host,
> +					       NULL, 0, DATA);
> +
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
>  static inline bool __should_serialize_io(struct inode *inode,
>  					struct writeback_control *wbc)
>  {
> @@ -3799,7 +4198,10 @@ static int __f2fs_write_data_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
>  	account_writeback(inode, true);
>  
>  	blk_start_plug(&plug);
> -	ret = f2fs_write_cache_pages(mapping, wbc, io_type);
> +	if (mapping_large_folio_support(inode->i_mapping))
> +		ret = f2fs_write_cache_folios(mapping, wbc, io_type);
> +	else
> +		ret = f2fs_write_cache_pages(mapping, wbc, io_type);
>  	blk_finish_plug(&plug);
>  
>  	account_writeback(inode, false);



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-17  3:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-15  4:18 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 00/14] f2fs: support & optimize large folios for writable files Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-15  4:18 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 01/14] f2fs: extend folio state for large folio write path Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-16  9:53   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-15  4:18 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 02/14] f2fs: carry subpage offset and count in write IO Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-15  4:18 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 03/14] f2fs: support regular file buffered writes on large folios Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-16 11:47   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-29 17:41   ` Daeho Jeong
2026-10-08  5:33     ` Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-10-02 17:02   ` Daeho Jeong
2026-10-08  5:46     ` Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-15  4:18 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 04/14] f2fs: support atomic file large folios buffered write Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-16 12:07   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-23  3:21     ` Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-23  7:22       ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-15  4:19 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 05/14] f2fs: support large folio writeback Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-17  3:48   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel [this message]
2026-09-21  2:52   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-10-02 20:51   ` Daeho Jeong
2026-09-15  4:19 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 06/14] f2fs: prepare mmap write faults for large folios Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-17  6:32   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-15  4:19 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 07/14] f2fs: make GC migration large-folio aware Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-15  4:19 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 08/14] f2fs: optimize small block size large folio read Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-16  4:33   ` Daeho Jeong
2026-09-23  2:36     ` Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-24  1:34     ` Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-17  8:09   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-15  4:19 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 09/14] f2fs: support partial uptodate " Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-15  4:19 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 10/14] f2fs: handle partial truncate of large folio dirty subpages Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-17  8:30   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-23  2:50     ` Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-23  7:18       ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-17  8:32   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-15  4:25 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 11/14] f2fs: fix zeroing paths for large folios Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-15  4:25 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 12/14] f2fs: handle block cloning within the same large folio Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-15  4:25 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 13/14] f2fs: allow large folio support to writeable files Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-17 14:07   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-15  4:25 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 14/14] f2fs: make compressed files compatible with large folio Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-22  3:09   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-30 17:08 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 00/14] f2fs: support & optimize large folios for writable files Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-10-03 13:40   ` [f2fs-dev] 答复: [External Mail]Re: " 赵南哲 via Linux-f2fs-devel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2c9b0602-88af-4759-b253-d1db87e52499@kernel.org \
    --to=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=David.Hildenbrand@arm.com \
    --cc=Dev.Jain@arm.com \
    --cc=Ryan.Roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=jyescas@google.com \
    --cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lipengfei28@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=nzzhao@126.com \
    --cc=zhangbo56@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.