From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 21:02:06 -0500
Subject: [PATCH v2 01/11] clk: Always use the supplied struct clk
In-Reply-To: <CAN5B=eLYoqOP3PGNHwD35DPdxWOFjkwaM7UeN75yLY8mtTvNyg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3411d84b-5a56-ae4e-1deb-085ef1a4971d@gmail.com>
 <da401261-b73f-afae-0702-ada1e7dd836b@gmail.com>
 <752D002CFF5D0F4FA35C0100F1D73F3FA46C88BE@ATCPCS16.andestech.com>
 <CAN5B=eLYoqOP3PGNHwD35DPdxWOFjkwaM7UeN75yLY8mtTvNyg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <2cea6898-1ce5-f7fe-694e-48d782d306d9@gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

> This patch is clock relative patch, if it is not a necessary patch for
> Sipeed Maix support.
> Please remove patch 1/11 and 2/11, and send them in another patch-sets.

Patches 10 and 11 rely on these first two patches. Should I just
reference the split off patches in the cover letter?