Re: do people use the 'git' command?

[Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>]

> I grant you that what the current "git" wrapper offers is not
> Porcelain enough, and to perform anything meaningful you either
> need to use Porcelain or bare Plumbing commands yourself.  But
> when that day comes, "git update-cache" is not something you
> would want to have anyway.  You would rather want to have things
> like "git add" and "git remove", which are written in terms of
> git-update-cache.
> 
> See what I am saying?

Ok, that's fair enough. It is a sound to expose bits of plumbing to
the porcelain in a very slow and deliberate way as the porcelain is
polished, rather than automatically surfacing plumbing as it gets
created by over-enthusiastic plumbers.

My own learning experience has been exactly the other way around to
the intended use of the git script - I have been learning to use the
core git commands, writing my own wrappers where that is convenient
and adopting those of others only when I completely understand what
they are doing - I have been learning it inside out, I guess.

For example, I only recently discovered what git-commit-script does  [
and I like it - btw - nice behaviour ]!

jon.
-- 
homepage: http://www.zeta.org.au/~jon/
blog: http://orwelliantremors.blogspot.com/