All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
To: thinker.li@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
	martin.lau@linux.dev, kernel-team@meta.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	liuhangbin@gmail.com
Cc: sinquersw@gmail.com, kuifeng@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/5] net/ipv6: Remove expired routes with a separated list of routes.
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2024 21:45:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ddfe75a-45e4-4499-8aae-4d83de90d1ce@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240202082200.227031-4-thinker.li@gmail.com>

On 2/2/24 1:21 AM, thinker.li@gmail.com wrote:
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> index 733ace18806c..36bfa987c314 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> @@ -1255,6 +1255,7 @@ static void
>  cleanup_prefix_route(struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp, unsigned long expires,
>  		     bool del_rt, bool del_peer)
>  {
> +	struct fib6_table *table;
>  	struct fib6_info *f6i;
>  
>  	f6i = addrconf_get_prefix_route(del_peer ? &ifp->peer_addr : &ifp->addr,

addrconf_get_prefix_route walks the table, so you know it is already
there ...

> @@ -1264,8 +1265,18 @@ cleanup_prefix_route(struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp, unsigned long expires,
>  		if (del_rt)
>  			ip6_del_rt(dev_net(ifp->idev->dev), f6i, false);
>  		else {
> -			if (!(f6i->fib6_flags & RTF_EXPIRES))
> +			if (!(f6i->fib6_flags & RTF_EXPIRES)) {
> +				table = f6i->fib6_table;
> +				spin_lock_bh(&table->tb6_lock);
>  				fib6_set_expires(f6i, expires);
> +				/* If fib6_node is null, the f6i is just
> +				 * removed from the table.
> +				 */
> +				if (rcu_dereference_protected(f6i->fib6_node,

... meaning this check should not be needed

> +							      lockdep_is_held(&table->tb6_lock)))
> +					fib6_add_gc_list(f6i);
> +				spin_unlock_bh(&table->tb6_lock);
> +			}
>  			fib6_info_release(f6i);
>  		}
>  	}
> @@ -2706,6 +2717,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(addrconf_prefix_rcv_add_addr);
>  void addrconf_prefix_rcv(struct net_device *dev, u8 *opt, int len, bool sllao)
>  {
>  	struct prefix_info *pinfo;
> +	struct fib6_table *table;
>  	__u32 valid_lft;
>  	__u32 prefered_lft;
>  	int addr_type, err;
> @@ -2782,11 +2794,23 @@ void addrconf_prefix_rcv(struct net_device *dev, u8 *opt, int len, bool sllao)
>  			if (valid_lft == 0) {
>  				ip6_del_rt(net, rt, false);
>  				rt = NULL;
> -			} else if (addrconf_finite_timeout(rt_expires)) {
> -				/* not infinity */
> -				fib6_set_expires(rt, jiffies + rt_expires);
>  			} else {
> -				fib6_clean_expires(rt);
> +				table = rt->fib6_table;
> +				spin_lock_bh(&table->tb6_lock);

when it comes to locking, I prefer the lock and unlock lines to *pop* -
meaning newline on both sides so it is clear and stands out.

> +				if (addrconf_finite_timeout(rt_expires)) {
> +					/* not infinity */
> +					fib6_set_expires(rt, jiffies + rt_expires);
> +					/* If fib6_node is null, the f6i is
> +					 * just removed from the table.
> +					 */
> +					if (rcu_dereference_protected(rt->fib6_node,

similarly here, this code is entered because rt is set based on
addrconf_get_prefix_route.

> +								      lockdep_is_held(&table->tb6_lock)))
> +						fib6_add_gc_list(rt);
> +				} else {
> +					fib6_clean_expires(rt);
> +					fib6_remove_gc_list(rt);
> +				}
> +				spin_unlock_bh(&table->tb6_lock);
>  			}
>  		} else if (valid_lft) {
>  			clock_t expires = 0;
> @@ -4741,6 +4765,7 @@ static int modify_prefix_route(struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp,
>  			       unsigned long expires, u32 flags,
>  			       bool modify_peer)
>  {
> +	struct fib6_table *table;
>  	struct fib6_info *f6i;
>  	u32 prio;
>  
> @@ -4761,10 +4786,21 @@ static int modify_prefix_route(struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp,
>  				      ifp->rt_priority, ifp->idev->dev,
>  				      expires, flags, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	} else {
> -		if (!expires)
> +		table = f6i->fib6_table;
> +		spin_lock_bh(&table->tb6_lock);
> +		if (!expires) {
>  			fib6_clean_expires(f6i);
> -		else
> +			fib6_remove_gc_list(f6i);
> +		} else {
>  			fib6_set_expires(f6i, expires);
> +			/* If fib6_node is null, the f6i is just removed
> +			 * from the table.
> +			 */
> +			if (rcu_dereference_protected(f6i->fib6_node,

and here as well. f6i is set based on a table lookup.

> +						      lockdep_is_held(&table->tb6_lock)))
> +				fib6_add_gc_list(f6i);
> +		}
> +		spin_unlock_bh(&table->tb6_lock);
>  
>  		fib6_info_release(f6i);
>  	}

...

> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ndisc.c b/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
> index a68462668158..5ca9fd4f7945 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
> @@ -1410,8 +1410,17 @@ static enum skb_drop_reason ndisc_router_discovery(struct sk_buff *skb)
>  		inet6_rt_notify(RTM_NEWROUTE, rt, &nlinfo, NLM_F_REPLACE);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (rt)
> +	if (rt) {
> +		spin_lock_bh(&rt->fib6_table->tb6_lock);
>  		fib6_set_expires(rt, jiffies + (HZ * lifetime));
> +		/* If fib6_node is null, the f6i is just removed from the
> +		 * table.
> +		 */

How about:
		/* If fib6_node is NULL, the route was removed between
		 * the rt6_get_dflt_router or rt6_add_dflt_router calls
		 * above and here.
		 */

> +		if (rcu_dereference_protected(rt->fib6_node,> +					      lockdep_is_held(&rt->fib6_table->tb6_lock)))
> +			fib6_add_gc_list(rt);
> +		spin_unlock_bh(&rt->fib6_table->tb6_lock);
> +	}
>  	if (in6_dev->cnf.accept_ra_min_hop_limit < 256 &&
>  	    ra_msg->icmph.icmp6_hop_limit) {
>  		if (in6_dev->cnf.accept_ra_min_hop_limit <= ra_msg->icmph.icmp6_hop_limit) {
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
> index dd6ff5b20918..cfaf226ecf98 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
> @@ -989,10 +989,20 @@ int rt6_route_rcv(struct net_device *dev, u8 *opt, int len,
>  				 (rt->fib6_flags & ~RTF_PREF_MASK) | RTF_PREF(pref);
>  
>  	if (rt) {
> -		if (!addrconf_finite_timeout(lifetime))
> +		spin_lock_bh(&rt->fib6_table->tb6_lock);
> +		if (!addrconf_finite_timeout(lifetime)) {
>  			fib6_clean_expires(rt);
> -		else
> +			fib6_remove_gc_list(rt);
> +		} else {
>  			fib6_set_expires(rt, jiffies + HZ * lifetime);
> +			/* If fib6_node is null, the f6i is just removed
> +			 * from the table.
> +			 */

Similarly, enhance the comment:
			/* If fib6_node is NULL, the route was removed
			 * between the get or add calls above and here.
			 */
> +			if (rcu_dereference_protected(rt->fib6_node,
> +						      lockdep_is_held(&rt->fib6_table->tb6_lock)))
> +				fib6_add_gc_list(rt);
> +		}
> +		spin_unlock_bh(&rt->fib6_table->tb6_lock);
>  
>  		fib6_info_release(rt);
>  	}


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-05  4:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-02  8:21 [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] Remove expired routes with a separated list of routes thinker.li
2024-02-02  8:21 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/5] net/ipv6: set expires in rt6_add_dflt_router() thinker.li
2024-02-02 11:52   ` Hangbin Liu
2024-02-05  4:42   ` David Ahern
2024-02-02  8:21 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/5] net/ipv6: Remove unnecessary clean thinker.li
2024-02-05  4:42   ` David Ahern
2024-02-02  8:21 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/5] net/ipv6: Remove expired routes with a separated list of routes thinker.li
2024-02-04 10:29   ` Hangbin Liu
2024-02-04 16:10     ` David Ahern
2024-02-05  4:45   ` David Ahern [this message]
2024-02-05 15:24     ` David Ahern
2024-02-02  8:21 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/5] net/ipv6: set expires in modify_prefix_route() if RTF_EXPIRES is set thinker.li
2024-02-02 12:16   ` Hangbin Liu
2024-02-02 17:57     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-04 10:17       ` Hangbin Liu
2024-02-05 18:59         ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-02  8:22 ` [PATCH net-next v3 5/5] selftests/net: Adding test cases of replacing routes and route advertisements thinker.li
2024-02-02 12:37   ` Hangbin Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2ddfe75a-45e4-4499-8aae-4d83de90d1ce@kernel.org \
    --to=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
    --cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
    --cc=thinker.li@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.