All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tao Cui <cui.tao@linux.dev>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: cui.tao@linux.dev, "Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/cgroup: Fix intermittent test_cgfreezer_ptrace test failures
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 09:24:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2e5102e4-0732-41c2-a5be-bbff2f386e58@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ae04b8055b7145e182380a46f92c26e@kernel.org>



在 2026/7/15 06:09, Tejun Heo 写道:
> Hello, Waiman.
> 
>> +	usleep(1000);
>>  	if (cg_check_frozen(cgroup, true))
>>  		goto cleanup;
> 
> A fixed 1ms sleep only hides the race. On a loaded machine or a slow arch
> (you mention ppc64) the refreeze can take longer than 1ms, and the test
> reads the unfrozen state and fails anyway.
> 
> The freezer test already has a way to wait for this properly.
> cg_prepare_for_wait() sets up an inotify watch on cgroup.events and
> cg_wait_for() blocks until it changes. cg_enter_and_wait_for_frozen() shows
> the pattern: loop cg_wait_for() then cg_check_frozen(). The cgroup always
> ends up frozen, so looping until cg_check_frozen() reports frozen is
> reliable and doesn't depend on timing.
> 
> Can you respin using that instead of usleep()?
> 
> Also, temporaily -> temporarily, in both the changelog and the comment.
> 

Hi Tejun, Waiman,

I ran into a similar issue a while back and can add a data point on
the reproducibility: when running the full cgroup selftest suite, a
few cases -- test_cgfreezer_ptrace and test_cgfreezer_stopped -- fail
intermittently (around 40-70% on VMs), yet each failing case passes
reliably when run on its own. That points at state carried across
tests rather than a per-test bug, which is also why a fixed sleep/retry
is fragile.

On the "unfrozen state" above, I traced where CGRP_FROZEN actually gets
cleared. When the frozen tracee is woken by PTRACE_INTERRUPT,
JOBCTL_TRAP_STOP takes priority over JOBCTL_TRAP_FREEZE in get_signal(),
so the task enters ptrace_stop() instead of going back to
do_freezer_trap(). With debug printk in cgroup_update_frozen_flag() and
cgroup_leave_frozen(), the cg_test_ptrace trace shows:

  0 -> 1  nr_frozen=1  task_count=1   /* initial freeze            */
  1 -> 0  nr_frozen=0  task_count=1   /* dec, task still in cgroup */
  0 -> 1  nr_frozen=0  task_count=0   /* task left cgroup          */

The 1 -> 0 step (nr_frozen 1->0 while task_count is still 1) is
cgroup_dec_frozen_cnt(), called from cgroup_leave_frozen(true) at the
end of ptrace_stop() (signal.c:2479) when the tracee is woken by
PTRACE_DETACH. That clears CGRP_FROZEN until the task loops back into
do_freezer_trap() and re-enters the frozen state -- the transient
unfrozen window the test hits.

As a kernel-side attempt I changed cgroup_enter_frozen() so it no longer
returns early when current->frozen is already true: css_set_lock is
taken before the check and, if CGRP_FREEZE is still set,
cgroup_update_frozen() is called to re-verify the cgroup frozen state
when a frozen task is handed off to ptrace.

Due to other work I've had to pause this investigation for now, so I'm
sharing the above as a data point rather than a finished fix.

Thanks,
Tao

> Thanks.
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-15  1:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-14 18:31 [PATCH] selftests/cgroup: Fix intermittent test_cgfreezer_ptrace test failures Waiman Long
2026-07-14 22:09 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-15  1:24   ` Tao Cui [this message]
2026-07-15  4:17     ` Waiman Long
2026-07-15  1:25   ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2e5102e4-0732-41c2-a5be-bbff2f386e58@linux.dev \
    --to=cui.tao@linux.dev \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.