From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA997F87E for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 20:34:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 00DKY68L028281 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 13 Jan 2020 12:34:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.25.44.8] (172.25.44.8) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.468.0; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 12:34:05 -0800 To: "Mingde (Matthew) Zeng" , openembeded-devel References: <20200109210518.22451-1-schnitzeltony@gmail.com> <87k15vw1jv.fsf@windriver.com> From: Randy MacLeod Message-ID: <2ec962d4-e6de-2ed2-2b4f-436041fccac3@windriver.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 15:34:03 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87k15vw1jv.fsf@windriver.com> X-Originating-IP: [172.25.44.8] Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] poppler: upgrade 0.82.0 -> 0.84.0 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 20:34:05 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-CA On 1/13/20 3:20 PM, Mingde (Matthew) Zeng wrote: >>> Have you by chance tried to add ptest coverage for poppler? >>> If not, Matthew may do that. >>> >>> >> Have not done any ptest on this - just some runtime tests on target with evince >> >> Andreas > ``` > $ make test > Running tests... > Test project /home/mzeng/code/poppler/build > Start 1: check_qt5_attachments > 1/21 Test #1: check_qt5_attachments ............***Failed 2.47 sec > Start 2: check_qt5_dateConversion > 2/21 Test #2: check_qt5_dateConversion ......... Passed 0.58 sec > ... > ``` > > Poppler's `make test` runs tests from the `/build/qt5/tests` directory, which apparently are relying on qt5. > > ``` > /**************************************************************************** > ** Meta object code from reading C++ file 'check_attachments.cpp' > ** > ** Created by: The Qt Meta Object Compiler version 67 (Qt 5.14.0) > ** > ** WARNING! All changes made in this file will be lost! > *****************************************************************************/ > > #include > #include > #include > ... > ``` > > Is it worth it to write a ptest and sort out the meta-qt5 layer? No, we can't have meta-openembedded packages depend on meta-qt5 content. The meta-oe layer only depends on oe-core (aka core): http://cgit.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/tree/meta-oe/conf/layer.conf#n30 Thanks for looking into it Matthew, ../Randy > > Matthew -- # Randy MacLeod # Wind River Linux