From: sukhdeep@gmail.com (Sukhdeep Johar)
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [lm-sensors] w83781d.o: Subclient 0 registration at address 0x49
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 08:09:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ef564dc05061323084131d795@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2ef564dc05061302175b8427fd@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks Jean !
Our motherboard is a custom one (used for our(Symbol) wireless switches )
They are similar to the kt400 is what i know.
Here is the i2cdump :
WS5K #i2cdump -y 0 0x29
No size specified (using byte-data access)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c d e f 0123456789abcdef
00: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
10: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
20: 71 5e ca bc c5 9d ca 1b ff 4c 2d 72 68 72 68 d8 q^??????.L-rhrh?
30: c4 c3 b0 d9 b2 31 15 3b 31 58 02 00 24 02 00 00 ?????1?;1X?.$?..
40: 01 00 10 00 00 00 00 56 29 02 32 44 41 95 00 a3 ?.?....V)?2DA?.?
50: ff ff 80 ff ff ff 00 00 30 70 ff ff 11 00 ff ff ..?.....0p..?...
60: 71 5e cb bc c4 9c ca 1b ff 4b 2e 72 68 72 68 d8 q^??????.K.rhrh?
70: c4 c3 b0 d9 b2 31 15 3b 31 58 02 00 24 02 00 00 ?????1?;1X?.$?..
80: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
90: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
a0: 71 5e cb bb c4 9c ca 1b ff 4c 2d 72 68 72 68 d8 q^??????.L-rhrh?
b0: c4 c3 b0 d9 b2 31 15 3b 31 58 02 00 24 02 00 00 ?????1?;1X?.$?..
c0: 01 00 10 00 00 00 00 56 29 02 32 44 41 95 00 a3 ?.?....V)?2DA?.?
d0: ff ff 80 ff ff ff 00 00 30 70 ff ff 11 00 ff ff ..?.....0p..?...
e0: 71 5e ca bc c4 9d ca 1b ff 4c 2d 72 68 72 68 d8 q^??????.L-rhrh?
f0: c4 c3 b0 d9 b2 31 15 3b 31 58 02 00 24 02 00 00 ?????1?;1X?.$?..
WS5K #i2cdump -y 0 0x2d
No size specified (using byte-data access)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c d e f 0123456789abcdef
00: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
10: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
20: 53 00 00 bb 00 00 00 7f 2e 2d 2f 00 00 00 00 d8 S..?...?.-/....?
30: c4 c3 b0 d9 b2 31 15 3b 31 08 40 40 00 00 00 00 ?????1?;1?@@....
40: 01 20 00 00 00 00 00 5f 2d 03 01 44 41 95 00 a3 ? ....._-??DA?.?
50: ff ff 00 ff ff ff 00 00 30 70 ff ff 11 00 ff ff ........0p..?...
60: 53 00 00 bc 00 00 00 7f 2e 2d 2e 00 00 00 00 d8 S..?...?.-.....?
70: c4 c3 b0 d9 b2 31 15 3b 31 08 40 40 00 00 00 00 ?????1?;1?@@....
80: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
90: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
a0: 53 00 00 bb 00 00 00 7f 2e 2e 2e 00 00 00 00 d8 S..?...?.......?
b0: c4 c3 b0 d9 b2 31 15 3b 31 08 40 40 00 00 00 00 ?????1?;1?@@....
c0: 01 20 00 00 00 00 00 5f 2d 03 01 44 41 95 00 a3 ? ....._-??DA?.?
d0: ff ff 00 ff ff ff 00 00 30 70 ff ff 11 00 ff ff ........0p..?...
e0: 53 00 00 bb 00 00 00 7f 2f 2d 2e 00 00 00 00 d8 S..?...?/-.....?
f0: c4 c3 b0 d9 b2 31 15 3b 31 08 40 40 00 00 00 00 ?????1?;1?@@....
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The warning went after loading with :
#modprobe w83781d init=0 force_subclients=0,0x29,0x4a,0x4b
But, I now see that the sensors command gives _TWO_ results :
WS5K #sensors
w83782d-i2c-0-29
Adapter: SMBus Via Pro adapter at 0400
VCore 1: +1.81 V (min = +1.66 V, max = +1.82 V)
VCore 2: +1.50 V (min = +1.66 V, max = +1.82 V)
+3.3V: +3.23 V (min = +3.14 V, max = +3.46 V)
+5V: +5.06 V (min = +4.74 V, max = +5.24 V)
+12V: +11.97 V (min = +10.83 V, max = +13.19 V)
-12V: -2.01 V (min = -13.16 V, max = -10.90 V)
-5V: +2.43 V (min = -5.26 V, max = -4.76 V)
V5SB: +5.02 V (min = +4.74 V, max = +5.24 V)
VBaT: +2.13 V (min = +2.40 V, max = +3.60 V)
My fan: 0 RPM (min = -1 RPM, div = 2)
fan2: 9000 RPM (min = 18750 RPM, div = 2)
fan3: 14673 RPM (min = 337500 RPM, div = 2)
temp1: +28 C (high = +88 C, hyst = +2 C) sensor = thermistor
temp2: +70.5 C (high = +80 C, hyst = +75 C) sensor = thermistor
temp3: -48.0 C (high = +80 C, hyst = +75 C) sensor = thermistor
vid: +1.750 V (VRM Version 8.2)
alarms: Chassis intrusion detection ALARM
beep_enable:
Sound alarm disabled
w83782d-i2c-0-2d
Adapter: SMBus Via Pro adapter at 0400
VCore 1: +1.33 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
VCore 2: +0.00 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
+3.3V: +0.00 V (min = +2.82 V, max = +3.79 V)
+5V: +5.02 V (min = +3.49 V, max = +0.00 V)
+12V: +0.00 V (min = +4.14 V, max = +0.00 V)
-12V: -14.91 V (min = -4.37 V, max = -14.91 V)
-5V: -7.71 V (min = -7.71 V, max = +2.24 V)
V5SB: +0.00 V (min = +0.22 V, max = +0.50 V)
VBaT: +0.00 V (min = +0.13 V, max = +0.00 V)
My fan: 14361 RPM (min = 10546 RPM, div = 2)
fan2: 14673 RPM (min = -1 RPM, div = 2)
fan3: 14673 RPM (min = -1 RPM, div = 2)
temp1: +127 C (high = +8 C, hyst = +64 C) sensor = thermistor
temp2: +79.5 C (high = +80 C, hyst = +75 C) sensor = thermistor
temp3: +63.0 C (high = +80 C, hyst = +75 C) sensor = thermistor
vid: +0.000 V (VRM Version 8.2)
alarms:
beep_enable:
Sound alarm disabled
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The first one is what I was seeing earlier. Only temp3 is now -49C
in place of 16C.
And if you see the first line of output - w83782d-i2c-0-29
I guess, it was actually being loaded at 0x29 only.
The second output seems quite vague.
I also see two directories created in the /proc -
WS5K #cat /proc/sys/dev/sensors/
chips w83782d-i2c-0-29 w83782d-i2c-0-2d
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Can you make out what's going wrong ?
regards,
Sukhdeep
On 6/13/05, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> wrote:
> Hi Sukhdeep,
>
> > The Motherbowrd is from VIAPRO, it's similar to kt400.
>
> VIA Pro / KT400 is the name of the South Bridge. This doesn't tell me
> the motherboard itself is. Have you no idea? dmidecode [1] may help.
>
> [1] http://www.nongnu.org/dmidecode/
>
> > Client found at address 0x29
> > (...)
> > Probing for `Winbond W83782D'... Success!
> > (confidence 8, driver `w83781d'), other addresses: 0x48 0x49
> > (...)
> > Client found at address 0x2d
> > (...)
> > Probing for `Winbond W83782D'... Success!
> > (confidence 8, driver `w83781d'), other addresses: 0x48 0x49
>
> Wow. So it does actually find *two* W83782D chips, which share the same
> subclient addresses. This is no good.
>
> Can you please provide the output of the following commands:
> i2cdump -y 0 0x29
> i2cdump -y 0 0x2d
>
> (I assume this is on i2c bus 0; if not, put the correct ID.)
>
> > Probing for `Winbond W83697HF Super IO Sensors'
> > Success... but not activated
>
> And the Super-I/O is there. I suspect that the W83697F has the same ID,
> so we cannot differenciate, but the W83697F has no hardware monitoring
> logical device - which would explain why it is listed as 'not activated"
> here.
>
> So... the correct modprobe line for you would be:
>
> modprobe w83781d force_subclient=0,0x29,0x4a,0x4b
>
> Try it :)
>
> --
> Jean Delvare
>
--
Everybody has the right to be stupid..... But some abuse the privilege
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-14 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-13 11:17 [lm-sensors] w83781d.o: Subclient 0 registration at address 0x49 Sukhdeep Johar
2005-06-13 11:44 ` Jean Delvare
2005-06-13 12:25 ` Jean Delvare
2005-06-13 12:41 ` Sukhdeep Johar
2005-06-13 19:15 ` [lm-sensors] w83781d.o: Subclient 0 registration at address Jean Delvare
2005-06-13 22:25 ` [lm-sensors] w83781d.o: Subclient 0 registration at address 0x49 Yani Ioannou
2005-06-13 22:34 ` [lm-sensors] w83781d.o: Subclient 0 registration at address Jean Delvare
2005-06-13 23:01 ` [lm-sensors] w83781d.o: Subclient 0 registration at address 0x49 Yani Ioannou
2005-06-13 23:11 ` [lm-sensors] w83781d.o: Subclient 0 registration at address Jean Delvare
2005-06-14 8:09 ` Sukhdeep Johar [this message]
2005-06-14 8:18 ` [lm-sensors] w83781d.o: Subclient 0 registration at address 0x49 Sukhdeep Johar
2005-06-14 8:53 ` Yani Ioannou
2005-06-14 10:20 ` Jean Delvare
2005-06-14 15:18 ` Jean Delvare
2005-06-14 17:13 ` Sukhdeep Johar
2005-06-14 20:46 ` [lm-sensors] w83781d.o: Subclient 0 registration at address Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2ef564dc05061323084131d795@mail.gmail.com \
--to=sukhdeep@gmail.com \
--cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.