From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Grzegorz_Ja=C5=9Bkiewicz?= <gryzman@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Congratulations! we have got hash function screwed up
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:43:56 +0100
Message-ID: <2f4958ff050120154330188420@mail.gmail.com>
References: <77912E9FD42896419D1CEF15E1C397A58AFCF1@london.jaguarfreightservices.local>
	 <m38y7gx8kq.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org>
	 <20041230235911.4911a20c.hihone@bigpond.net.au>
	 <m3sm5nj2ef.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> <41D42F93.9060107@namesys.com>
	 <2f4958ff050118131714f5411c@mail.gmail.com>
	 <41EE859D.3020305@namesys.com> <41EFAFB0.2000606@namesys.com>
Reply-To: =?UTF-8?Q?Grzegorz_Ja=C5=9Bkiewicz?= <gryzman@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-23183-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <41EFAFB0.2000606@namesys.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Edward Shishkin <edward@namesys.com>
Cc: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>, Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de>, hihone@bigpond.net.au, reiserfs-list@namesys.com

All I know is that xxtea is fixed tea algo. If that fixes weakness in
crypto algo, than so it should make hashing better.
No doubt there is no ideal hash algo, but if base algo has weaknes,
using fixed one only can be better, Right ?

-- 
GJ