From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Regressions <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
Linux Wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Anjaneyulu <pagadala.yesu.anjaneyulu@intel.com>,
"Gregory Greenman" <gregory.greenman@intel.com>,
"Johannes Berg" <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
"Niklāvs Koļesņikovs" <pinkflames.linux@gmail.com>,
"Fabio Comolli" <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
Subject: Fwd: iwlmvm: Linux 6.7 pre-rc1 prints stack trace of iwl_op_mode_mvm_start; caused by commit b6e3d1ba4fcf
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 20:13:39 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2fa930bb-54dd-4942-a88d-05a47c8e9731@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
I notice a regression report on Bugzilla [1]. Quoting from it:
> When testing the branch that will become Linux 6.7-rc1, ever since commit b6e3d1ba4fcf02176846d03a930203d8133c0aaf I have observed the following abbreviated kernel stack trace (please see attachments for the full trace):
>
> ```
> [ 6.733281] ? __warn+0xc3/0x1d0
> [ 6.733284] ? iwl_op_mode_mvm_start+0x9c4/0x9d0 [iwlmvm]
> [ 6.733299] ? report_bug+0x167/0x220
> [ 6.733301] ? handle_bug+0x3d/0x90
> [ 6.733304] ? exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x60
> [ 6.733306] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
> [ 6.733309] ? iwl_op_mode_mvm_start+0x9c4/0x9d0 [iwlmvm]
> [ 6.733325] _iwl_op_mode_start+0x66/0xe0 [iwlwifi]
> [ 6.733338] iwl_opmode_register+0x87/0xd0 [iwlwifi]
> [ 6.733350] ? __cfi_init_module+0x10/0x10 [iwlmvm]
> [ 6.733364] init_module+0x22/0xff0 [iwlmvm]
> [ 6.733378] ? __cfi_init_module+0x10/0x10 [iwlmvm]
> [ 6.733392] do_one_initcall+0x129/0x380
> [ 6.733395] ? idr_alloc_cyclic+0x148/0x1e0
> [ 6.733397] ? security_kernfs_init_security+0x41/0x80
> [ 6.733399] ? __kernfs_new_node+0x1be/0x250
> [ 6.733401] ? preempt_count_add+0x55/0xb0
> [ 6.733404] ? up_write+0x4a/0xe0
> [ 6.733406] ? preempt_count_add+0x55/0xb0
> [ 6.733408] ? sysvec_call_function+0xa4/0xb0
> [ 6.733410] ? asm_sysvec_call_function+0x1a/0x20
> [ 6.733411] ? free_unref_page_prepare+0xf3/0x410
> [ 6.733413] ? preempt_count_add+0x62/0xb0
> [ 6.733415] ? _raw_spin_trylock+0x19/0x60
> [ 6.733417] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x11/0x30
> [ 6.733419] ? __kmem_cache_free+0x29a/0x3c0
> [ 6.733421] ? vfree+0xd2/0x150
> [ 6.733422] ? slab_post_alloc_hook+0x76/0x3d0
> [ 6.733425] ? do_init_module+0x3f/0x230
> [ 6.733427] ? __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1fe/0x2f0
> [ 6.733430] do_init_module+0x7a/0x230
> [ 6.733432] __se_sys_init_module+0x1a0/0x220
> [ 6.733435] do_syscall_64+0x7a/0x100
> [ 6.733438] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x2d/0x1d0
> [ 6.733440] ? do_syscall_64+0x89/0x100
> [ 6.733442] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x4e7/0x680
> [ 6.733444] ? exc_page_fault+0x61/0x150
> [ 6.733446] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76
> ```
>
> I did try reverting the offending commit but the result did not compile and I did not want to dig deeper to identify any subsequent commits what would need reverting to fix compilation.
>
> If it's relevant, I'm building the kernel with Clang 17.0.4 toolchain by setting the LLVM=1 variable. CFI is enabled but I'm not sure if it's actually functional.
See Bugzilla for the full thread.
Anyway, I'm adding this regression to regzbot:
#regzbot introduced: b6e3d1ba4fcf02 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218095
#regzbot title: new iwlwifi firmware statistics API triggers stack trace
Thanks.
[1]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218095
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
next reply other threads:[~2023-11-03 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-03 13:13 Bagas Sanjaya [this message]
2023-11-12 11:18 ` Fwd: iwlmvm: Linux 6.7 pre-rc1 prints stack trace of iwl_op_mode_mvm_start; caused by commit b6e3d1ba4fcf Bagas Sanjaya
2023-11-12 11:51 ` Damian Tometzki
2023-11-12 12:00 ` Damian Tometzki
2023-11-12 14:12 ` Bagas Sanjaya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2fa930bb-54dd-4942-a88d-05a47c8e9731@gmail.com \
--to=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=fabio.comolli@gmail.com \
--cc=gregory.greenman@intel.com \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pagadala.yesu.anjaneyulu@intel.com \
--cc=pinkflames.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.