Re: [PATCH 11/12] kho: return virtual address of mem_map

[Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>]

On Mon, May 11 2026, Mike Rapoport wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 03:39:13PM +0200, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
>> From: "Pratyush Yadav (Google)" <pratyush@kernel.org>
>> 
>> There are currently 3 callers of kho_get_mem_map_phys(). Two of them,
>> kho_mem_retrieve() and kho_extend_scratch() need the virtual address.
>> The third, kho_populate() doesn't care. Make things simpler by
>> directly returning the virtual address. Rename kho_get_mem_map_phys() to
>> kho_get_mem_map() to accurately reflect what it returns.
>
> This should be moved earlier, before replacing open-coded get_mem_map()
> with a call to kho_get_mem_map_phys().

Do you mean move it before patch 2 "kho: store incoming radix tree in
kho_in"?

I can do that. I did it this way to show a clear need for this function,
but I don't mind doing it as a preparatory step.

>  
>> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav (Google) <pratyush@kernel.org>
>> ---
>>  kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------------
>>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

-- 
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav