All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
To: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	 Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	 Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] liveupdate: Reference count outgoing FLB data
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2026 19:15:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2vxzfr34dfty.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260528174140.1921129-2-dmatlack@google.com> (David Matlack's message of "Thu, 28 May 2026 17:41:39 +0000")

Hi David,

On Thu, May 28 2026, David Matlack wrote:

> Increment the outgoing FLB refcount in liveupdate_flb_get_outgoing() so
> that the FLB structure cannot be freed while the caller is actively
> using it. Add an additional liveupdate_flb_put_outgoing() function so
> the caller can explicitly indicate when it is done using the outgoing
> FLB.
>
> During a Live Update, the kernel may need to fetch the outgoing FLB
> outside of the scope of a file handler's preserve() and unpreserve()
> callbacks. In that situation there is no way for the caller to protect
> itself against the outgoing FLB from being freed while it is using it.
> Incrementing the reference count in liveupdate_flb_get_outgoing()
> ensures it cannot be freed.

We grab a reference to the FLB's module when the first file using the
FLB is preserved. So the FLB should never go away while preserved files
exist. Once all preserved files go away, you normally shouldn't be doing
anything with the FLB anyway.

Can you please elaborate on the use case and why this is a problem?
Using the FLB outside of the standard LUO file callbacks sounds
problematic.

>
> This change also aligns the outgoing FLB lifecycle management with the
> incoming FLB, since the latter uses the same get/put semantics.
>
> Fixes: cab056f2aae7 ("liveupdate: luo_flb: introduce File-Lifecycle-Bound global state")
> Assisted-by: Gemini:gemini-3-pro-preview
> Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
[...]

-- 
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav


  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-02 17:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-28 17:41 [PATCH 0/2] liveupdate: Small FLB fixes David Matlack
2026-05-28 17:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] liveupdate: Reference count outgoing FLB data David Matlack
2026-06-02 17:15   ` Pratyush Yadav [this message]
2026-06-02 17:25     ` David Matlack
2026-06-03  3:36   ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-28 17:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] liveupdate: Remember FLB retrieve() status David Matlack
2026-06-02 17:18   ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-06-03  3:36   ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-06-04  5:28 ` [PATCH 0/2] liveupdate: Small FLB fixes Mike Rapoport
2026-06-05 13:09   ` Pratyush Yadav

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2vxzfr34dfty.fsf@kernel.org \
    --to=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.