From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kho: drop restriction on maximum page order
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 09:12:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2vxzo6kmddl8.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa_zglmh3AU2_RA0@kernel.org> (Mike Rapoport's message of "Tue, 10 Mar 2026 12:33:38 +0200")
On Tue, Mar 10 2026, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 12:34:07PM +0000, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
>> KHO currently restricts the maximum order of a restored page to the
>> maximum order supported by the buddy allocator. While this works fine
>> for much of the data passed across kexec, it is possible to have pages
>> larger than MAX_PAGE_ORDER.
>>
>> For one, it is possible to get a larger order when using
>> kho_preserve_pages() if the number of pages is large enough, since it
>> tries to combine multiple aligned 0-order preservations into one higher
>> order preservation.
>>
>> For another, upcoming support for hugepages can have gigantic hugepages
>> being preserved over KHO.
>>
>> There is no real reason for this limit. The KHO preservation machinery
>> can handle any page order. Remove this artificial restriction on max
>> page order.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav (Google) <pratyush@kernel.org>
>
> One SOB should be enough ;-)
Hmm, I figured the unemployed me (who originally wrote the patch) and
the employed-by-google me (who is doing this new version) would count as
two separate entities and there should be a S-o-b for both.
Anyway, I am fine with dropping either one of the two.
>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
Thanks!
[...]
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-17 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-09 12:34 [PATCH 1/2] kho: make sure preservations do not span multiple NUMA nodes Pratyush Yadav
2026-03-09 12:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] kho: drop restriction on maximum page order Pratyush Yadav
2026-03-10 10:33 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-03-17 9:12 ` Pratyush Yadav [this message]
2026-03-17 11:04 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-03-20 10:24 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-03-09 15:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] kho: make sure preservations do not span multiple NUMA nodes Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-10 10:32 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2vxzo6kmddl8.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.