From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Van Haaren Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>,
"Mattias Rönnblom" <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com>
Cc: "David Marchand" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
dpdklab <dpdklab@iol.unh.edu>,
ci@dpdk.org,
"Honnappa Nagarahalli" <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
"Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>,
"Aaron Conole" <aconole@redhat.com>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
"ci@dpdk.org" <ci@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: rte_service unit test failing randomly
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 22:52:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3000673.mvXUDI8C0e@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <739ee0ca-ccbe-5918-c2af-18e77327a898@ericsson.com>
05/10/2022 22:33, Mattias Rönnblom:
> On 2022-10-05 21:14, David Marchand wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > The service_autotest unit test has been failing randomly.
> > This is not something new.
> > We have been fixing this unit test and the service code, here and there.
> > For some time we were "fine": the failures were rare.
> >
> > But recenly (for the last two weeks at least), it started failing more
> > frequently in UNH lab.
> >
> > The symptoms are linked to places where the unit test code is "waiting
> > for some time":
> >
> > - service_lcore_attr_get:
> > + TestCase [ 5] : service_lcore_attr_get failed
> > EAL: Test assert service_lcore_attr_get line 422 failed: Service lcore
> > not stopped after waiting.
> >
> >
> > - service_may_be_active:
> > + TestCase [15] : service_may_be_active failed
> > ...
> > EAL: Test assert service_may_be_active line 960 failed: Error: Service
> > not stopped after 100ms
> >
> > Ideas?
> >
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> Do you run the test suite in a controlled environment? I.e., one where
> you can trust that the lcore threads aren't interrupted for long periods
> of time.
>
> 100 ms is not a long time if a SCHED_OTHER lcore thread competes for the
> CPU with other threads.
You mean the tests cannot be interrupted?
Then it looks very fragile.
Please could help making it more robust?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-05 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-05 19:14 rte_service unit test failing randomly David Marchand
2022-10-05 20:33 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-10-05 20:52 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2022-10-05 21:33 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-10-06 6:53 ` Morten Brørup
2022-10-06 7:04 ` David Marchand
2022-10-06 7:50 ` Morten Brørup
2022-10-06 7:50 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-10-06 8:18 ` Morten Brørup
2022-10-06 8:59 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-10-06 9:49 ` Morten Brørup
2022-10-06 11:07 ` [dpdklab] " Lincoln Lavoie
2022-10-06 12:00 ` Morten Brørup
2022-10-06 17:52 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-10-06 13:51 ` Aaron Conole
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3000673.mvXUDI8C0e@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=ci@dpdk.org \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dpdklab@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
--cc=mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.