From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "lihuisong (C)" <lihuisong@huawei.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stephen@networkplumber.org, liuyonglong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] ethdev: clarify do not something in the new event
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 10:15:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3006817.VdNmn5OnKV@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <363b8b06-652b-26e2-fc7e-30e22c916181@huawei.com>
16/01/2025 07:16, lihuisong (C):
>
> 在 2025/1/15 19:31, Thomas Monjalon 写道:
> > 15/01/2025 04:41, Huisong Li:
> >> If application verify the validity of the port id or configure this port in
> >> the new event callback, application may happen to the port id is invalid.
> >>
> >> Actually, when application receive a new event from one port, the port is
> >> not fully probed and is just in allocated state. Application doesn't need
> >> to verify the validity of the port id because it is definitely valid.
> >> What's more, application shouldn't do something like configuring this port
> >> or querying some information of this port by ethdev ops.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> >> ---
> >> lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h | 9 ++++++++-
> >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> >> index 1f71cad244..e2021f0f12 100644
> >> --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> >> +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> >> @@ -4128,7 +4128,14 @@ enum rte_eth_event_type {
> >> RTE_ETH_EVENT_VF_MBOX, /**< message from the VF received by PF */
> >> RTE_ETH_EVENT_MACSEC, /**< MACsec offload related event */
> >> RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_RMV, /**< device removal event */
> >> - RTE_ETH_EVENT_NEW, /**< port is probed */
> >> + /** Port is probed and application's event callback will be called.
> > We are not going to say that the callback is called for each event :)
> >
> >> + * In this moment, the port is not fully probed and is just in allocated
> >> + * state. When application receive this event, application doesn't need
> > It is not a real state.
> >
> >> + * to verify the validity of the port id because it is definitely valid.
> >> + * What's more, application shouldn't do something like configuring this
> >> + * port or querying some information of this port by ethdev ops.
> >> + */
> > Let me try shorter:
> > "
> > The port is being probed, i.e. allocated and not yet available.
> > It is too early to check validity, infos, or configuring the port.
> > "
> "
> The port is being probed, i.e. allocated and not yet available.
> It is too early to check validity, query infos, or configure the port.
> But the socket id and owner id related to this port can be considered as
> valid.
> "
> How about use above comments?
The last sentence should be in patch 2.
And I am not sure about saying they are valid.
It is more accurate to say that the functions for socket id and owner id are available.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-16 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-15 3:41 [PATCH v1 0/2] ethdev: clarify something about new event Huisong Li
2025-01-15 3:41 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] ethdev: clarify do not something in the " Huisong Li
2025-01-15 11:31 ` Thomas Monjalon
2025-01-16 6:16 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-01-16 9:15 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2025-01-16 9:35 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-01-15 3:41 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] ethdev: fix some APIs can be used " Huisong Li
2025-01-15 11:36 ` Thomas Monjalon
2025-01-16 6:14 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-01-16 9:09 ` Thomas Monjalon
2025-01-16 9:35 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-01-16 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] ethdev: clarify something about " Huisong Li
2025-01-16 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ethdev: clarify something about the " Huisong Li
2025-01-16 15:17 ` Thomas Monjalon
2025-01-16 18:31 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-01-17 8:43 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-01-16 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ethdev: fix some functions are available in " Huisong Li
2025-01-16 15:18 ` Thomas Monjalon
2025-01-17 8:43 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-01-17 9:12 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] ethdev: clarify something about " Huisong Li
2025-01-17 9:12 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ethdev: clarify something about the " Huisong Li
2025-01-17 9:12 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] ethdev: fix some functions are available in " Huisong Li
2025-01-24 7:25 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] ethdev: clarify something about " fengchengwen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3006817.VdNmn5OnKV@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=lihuisong@huawei.com \
--cc=liuyonglong@huawei.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.