All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel Blueman" <daniel.blueman@gmx.net>
To: Timothy Miller <miller@techsource.com>
Cc: aradford@3WARE.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: File system performance, hardware performance, ext3, 3ware RA ID1, etc.
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 17:25:52 +0100 (MET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <30156.1076775952@www12.gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 402D6354.3010801@techsource.com

Tim,

Do you get the same numbers (but slightly higher, as this is will measure
from a smaller portion of outer zones) with:

# hdparm -t /dev/sda

?

> Adam Radford wrote:
> > Perhaps you are issuing non purely sequential IO.  The card firmware
> does
> > some 
> > reodering, but at some point it will cause performance degradation.  Can
> you
> > try 
> > kernel 2.6 w/xfs? 
> 
> Not any time soon, but as I mentioned earlier, I measured 13.9 megs/sec 
> when I ran this command:
> 
>      time dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda2 bs=1024k count=1024
> 
> No file system was involved; I was simply writing zeros to the block 
> device (swap partition with swap off).  It took 73.522 seconds to do the 
> above operation.  Also, I was running in single-user mode while doing 
> the test.
> 
> > 
> > Also, in my experience, the 'raw io' interface doesn't issue any
> > asynchronous IO.  The
> > card _definately_ needs asynchronous IO posted to it or you will not get
> > good results
> > because you won't get all the drives busy.
> 
> With RAID1, both drives will be written with the same data.  There is no 
> need to be asynchronous, since it's all completely linear and sequential 
> with large data blocks.

-- 
Daniel J Blueman

GMX ProMail (250 MB Mailbox, 50 FreeSMS, Virenschutz, 2,99 EUR/Monat...)
jetzt 3 Monate GRATIS + 3x DER SPIEGEL +++ http://www.gmx.net/derspiegel +++


  reply	other threads:[~2004-02-14 16:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-13 23:07 File system performance, hardware performance, ext3, 3ware RA ID1, etc Adam Radford
2004-02-13 23:52 ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-14 16:25   ` Daniel Blueman [this message]
2004-02-16 17:18     ` Timothy Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=30156.1076775952@www12.gmx.net \
    --to=daniel.blueman@gmx.net \
    --cc=aradford@3WARE.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miller@techsource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.