All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [module-init-tools] fix weak symbol handling
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 07:34:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <30299.1042788854@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030116180913.C15981@twiddle.net>


rth@twiddle.net said:
> > > No.  The semantics I need is if A references a weak symbol S 
> > > and *no one* implements it, then S resolves to NULL.
> > 
> > Sorry, I was unclear.  I want to know the dependency semantics:
> 
> If B exports S, should depmod believe A needs B, or not?  Your patch
> leaves that semantic (all it does is suppress the errors).
> Well, that depends on whether A defines S or not.  If A does define S,
> then I don't care.  I'd say "no", A does not depend on B.  If A does
> not define S, then most definitely "yes", as with any other
> definition.

As long as doing so doesn't make modprobe fail to load A when B isn't 
present or refuses to load. Otherwise what was the point in making it weak?

--
dwmw2



  reply	other threads:[~2003-01-17  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-13 19:04 [module-init-tools] fix weak symbol handling Richard Henderson
2003-01-14  3:16 ` Rusty Russell
2003-01-15  1:14   ` Richard Henderson
2003-01-17  1:57     ` Rusty Russell
2003-01-17  2:09       ` Richard Henderson
2003-01-17  7:34         ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2003-01-17  8:56           ` Rusty Russell
2003-01-17  9:32             ` David Woodhouse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=30299.1042788854@passion.cambridge.redhat.com \
    --to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=davem@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.