From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
Cc: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problems using new Linux-2.4 bitkeeper repository.
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 10:49:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <30393.1016362174@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C938027.4040805@mandrakesoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <3C938027.4040805@mandrakesoft.com> <200203161608.g2GG8WC05423@localhost.localdomain> <3C9372BE.4000808@mandrakesoft.com> <20020316083059.A10086@work.bitmover.com> <3C9375B7.3070808@mandrakesoft.com> <20020316085213.B10086@work.bitmover.com> <3C937B82.60500@mandrakesoft.com> <20020316091452.E10086@work.bitmover.com>
jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com said:
> The system currently punishes Joe in Alaska and Mikhail in Russia if
> they independently apply the same GNU patch, and then later on wind
> up attempting to converge trees.
I tried to work round this by applying some patches which I require but
which Linus hasn't yet taken _only_ in my working tree, not actually
committing them.
But then BK wouldn't even let me pull from Linus' tree any more, because I
had locked and modified files. That also seems to be a fundamental flaw.
--
dwmw2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-17 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-15 2:38 Problems using new Linux-2.4 bitkeeper repository James Bottomley
2002-03-15 4:55 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-16 16:08 ` James Bottomley
2002-03-16 16:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-16 16:30 ` Larry McVoy
2002-03-16 16:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-16 16:52 ` Larry McVoy
2002-03-16 17:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-16 17:14 ` Larry McVoy
2002-03-16 17:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-16 17:38 ` Larry McVoy
2002-03-16 17:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-16 18:31 ` Christer Weinigel
2002-03-16 18:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-16 19:01 ` Larry McVoy
2002-03-16 19:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-17 10:49 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2002-03-17 15:54 ` Larry McVoy
2002-03-17 16:23 ` David Woodhouse
2002-03-17 18:15 ` Larry McVoy
2002-03-17 18:34 ` David Woodhouse
2002-03-18 15:25 ` Tom Rini
2002-03-16 17:17 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=30393.1016362174@redhat.com \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm@bitmover.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.