All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>
To: "seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>,
	"nicoyip.dev@gmail.com" <nicoyip.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>, "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Zhao, Yan Y" <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>,
	"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"tglx@kernel.org" <tglx@kernel.org>,
	"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Protect noncoherent DMA zaps with SRCU
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 21:36:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <303eb59af516335e288647c19254928f89fa833a.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aoyEMBz-SYLigbGp@google.com>

On Mon, 2026-08-24 at 10:49 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Alternatively, what if we have kvm_zap_gfn_range() acquire SRCU?  Nesting "locks"
> is a-ok, and two of the three users of kvm_zap_gfn_range() have had this bug (see
> commit 074c00800719 ("KVM: x86: Use SRCU to protect zap in
> __kvm_set_or_clear_apicv_inhibit()").

kvm_vcpu_srcu_read_lock() doesn't allow nesting lock of KVM's SRCU.  Doesn't
seem to be a problem for this particular case, though, because
sev_handle_rmp_fault() calls kvm_zap_gfn_range() after kvm_vcpu_srcu_read_lock()
is called.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-24 21:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-22 19:02 [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Protect noncoherent DMA zaps with SRCU Chengfeng Ye
2026-08-24  9:50 ` Huang, Kai
2026-08-24 17:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-08-24 21:36   ` Huang, Kai [this message]
2026-08-24 21:49     ` Sean Christopherson
2026-08-24 22:15       ` Huang, Kai
2026-08-25 18:40         ` Chengfeng Ye
2026-08-25 18:39 ` [PATCH v2] KVM: x86: Take SRCU in kvm_zap_gfn_range() Chengfeng Ye
2026-08-26  0:13   ` Huang, Kai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=303eb59af516335e288647c19254928f89fa833a.camel@intel.com \
    --to=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nicoyip.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.