From: "Zhenyu Wu" <y030729@njupt.edu.cn>
To: imipak@yahoo.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Scheduler Mechnisms!
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 00:55:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <304889647.25037@njupt.edu.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <304808537.11599@njupt.edu.cn>
Thank you very much, i will try to find these papers which must be very helpful
for me. The "more" means that whether there are other mechanisms not only for
Linux. Sorry, i have not make it clear! Sometimes, i wonder whether the qdiscs
such as CBQ, RED, GRED ... are belong to the scheduler mechanisms in linux
enviroment. For example, In Red, which i can find are enqueue, and dequeue.... so,
if i add a RED qidsc to a class, must i add a scheduler mechanism so that i can
decide which packet in the queues will be scheduled and put to the link?
Good luck,
Best,
>It depends on what you mean by "more". More for Linux?
> Certainly. HTB3 seems to be a popular mechanism, and
> you can use IMQ to set up an intermediate device to
> allow shaping of both inbound and outbound traffic,
> using one (or more!) scheduling mechanisms in series.
>
> (In fact, there are several versions of IMQ out there.
> I've given links to both the projects that seem to be
> alive, but there may be more.)
>
> There's also ESFQ, but there doesn't seem to be much
> active work on that. There are forward ports to recent
> Linux kernels, though. QLinux has a version of H-SFQ
> for Linux, but again it seems to be getting long in
> the tooth. Unfortunately, I can't find any forward
> ports of that.
>
> http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/
> http://www.linuximq.net/
> http://pupa.da.ru/imq/
>
> http://www.digriz.org.uk/jdg-qos-script/#qos-2.6
> http://kem.p.lodz.pl/~peter/qnet/
> http://lass.cs.umass.edu/software/qlinux/
>
> There are a great many systems that I can't find a
> Linux version of. Cisco routers support something
> called "Class-Based Weighted Fair Queueing" (CBWFQ)
> which seems to be a hybrid of classful and classless
> scheduling. Cisco also has two versions of ECN, for
> forwards and backwards propogation.
>
> I've listed below a number of papers detailing various
> QoS schemes. Some of these have been implemented in
> other OS' (the BSDs tend to get a lot of this stuff
> implemented quickly for them as part of ALTQ) and some
> I've never seen an implementation at all. However, the
> papers should all give enough information to write a
> version for Linux.
>
> Note: ALTQ can be found at:
> http://www.csl.sony.co.jp/person/kjc/kjc/software.html
>
> Please note that this list is not exhaustive. Rather,
> I got exhausted after trying to find what was out
> there and what state it was currently in. QoS is a big
> field, if the number of papers is anything to go by.
> Linux only touches the fringes of it. If anyone feels
> particularly bored, or in need of a good ego boost, it
> would be cool to see if a reasonable selection of
> these could be introduced into Linux over the 2.7
> cycle.
>
> EDF (Earliest Deadline First)
> http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/13919.html
>
> BLUE (an alternative to RED)
> http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/feng99blue.html
>
> AF PHB (Assured Forwarding Per-Hop Behaviour)
> http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/552302.html
>
> SFB (Stochastic Fair Blue)
> http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/551253.html
>
> GREEN (a pro-active variant on the theme of RED)
> http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/feng02green.html
>
> SMART (Scalable Multipath Aggregated RouTing)
> http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/vutukury00smart.html
>
> CSFQ (Core Stateless Fair Queueing)
> http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/391.html
>
> StFQ (Start-Time Fair Queueing)
> http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/goyal96starttime.html
>
> RFQ (Rainbow Fair Queueing)
> http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/cao00rainbow.html
>
> PrFQ (Probabalistic Fair Queueing)
> http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/anker00prfq.html
>
> ERR (Elastic Round Robin)
> http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/kanhere02fair.html
>
> GFQ (Greedy Fair Queueing)
> http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/690207.html
>
> PERR (Prioritized Elastic Round Robin)
> http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/681127.html
>
> AOQ (Anchored Opportunity Queueing)
> http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/701742.html
>
> BSFQ (Bin Sort Fair Queueing)
> http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/622188.html
>
>
> As for the final question on what happens between
> enqueue and dequeue, there are various diagrams out
> there which show different aspects of how packets
> traverse the system. I've included a few links to
> those I could find:
>
> http://open-source.arkoon.net/kernel/kernel_net.png
> http://ebtables.sourceforge.net/br_fw_ia/PacketFlow.png
> http://ebtables.sourceforge.net/br_fw_ia/br_fw_ia.html
> http://www.docum.org/docum.org/kptd/
>
> The last of these is the infamous Kernel Packet
> Travelling Diagram. Most links to this that I've been
> able to find are broken. It should be noted that the
> diagrams all refer to the Linux 2.4 kernel. Linux 2.6
> has quite a few QoS changes to it, but I'm unclear as
> to whether they significantly alter any of the flows.
>
> I hope this is of some use. Or, at the very least, is
> an effective remedy to insomnia. :)
>
> Jonathan
>
> --- Zhenyu Wu <y030729@njupt.edu.cn> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Normally, in addition to such qdisc scheduler
> > mechanisms as FIFO, PQ, WRR, WFQ,
> > are there any more? Then, there is a confusion on
> > scheduler in Linux enviroment:
> > Assume there is a qdisc, such as RED as a leaf qdisc
> > in a router, we know, if
> > there is packet which want to enqueue the packet,
> > the Function red_enqueue is
> > called, but when the packet leave the queue(when the
> > Function red_dequeue is
> > called)? I think it is meaningless when the pack
> > leaves the queue just it enterred
> > it. Is there anything need to be done betweent the
> > packet's enqueue and dequeue?
> >
> > Best,
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO:
> > http://lartc.org/
> >
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Jazz up your holiday email with celebrity designs. Learn more.
> http://celebrity.mail.yahoo.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-05 0:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-04 2:23 [LARTC] Scheduler Mechnisms! Zhenyu Wu
2005-01-04 5:39 ` Jonathan Day
2005-01-05 0:55 ` Zhenyu Wu [this message]
2005-01-05 3:59 ` Jonathan Day
2005-01-06 1:09 ` Zhenyu Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=304889647.25037@njupt.edu.cn \
--to=y030729@njupt.edu.cn \
--cc=imipak@yahoo.com \
--cc=lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.