From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Alexandru Dragoi Subject: Re: Port 21, 23, and 80 are open according to Shields Up at grc.com Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 04:15:22 +0300 Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <3063e504091218152748ca34@mail.gmail.com> References: <200409111150.50506.bulliver@badcomputer.no-ip.com> <8ca42282040911160952abec3b@mail.gmail.com> <3063e504091116141e3bf7f@mail.gmail.com> <8ca4228204091200382f2d9a04@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: George Alexandru Dragoi Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <8ca4228204091200382f2d9a04@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Ok, I was tired :) I thought the Gibson stuff is some sort of web page used to scan, so i thought you scanned 192.168.0.0/24 from some webpage, that's why my answer (i was even worse tired, i thought that page is located at insecure.org, that was actually the result of nmap output). I am curious how that test explain the manner HOW the ports are opened. Maybe they are just not filtered. On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 03:38:48 -0400, Mike <1100100@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't understand this response. > > > > On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 02:14:58 +0300, George Alexandru Dragoi > wrote: > > Maybe insecure.org has theyr own 192.168.0.0 private LAN :) > -- Bla bla