From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Alexandru Dragoi Subject: Re: (no subject) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 20:55:55 +0300 Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <3063e50409211055b53fba6@mail.gmail.com> References: <1095620074.3098.1.camel@jabbera-laptop> <41503CFC.5030107@pbl.ca> <3063e504092109437d76aedc@mail.gmail.com> <1095787664.1897.23.camel@wolfpack.ljm.dom> Reply-To: George Alexandru Dragoi Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1095787664.1897.23.camel@wolfpack.ljm.dom> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org I think he miss some -o $iface in his rule. Otherwise to much stuff get SNAT-ed :) And yea, i was thinking on NETMAP. If adding the correct -o wont work, then the output of route -n and your nat rules might help. On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:27:45 -0400, Jason Opperisano wrote: > On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 12:43, George Alexandru Dragoi wrote: > > http://www.netfilter.org/patch-o-matic/pom-base.html#pom-base-SAME > > > > > > did you mean: > > http://www.netfilter.org/patch-o-matic/pom-base.html#pom-base-NETMAP > > and the OP's problem was one of ARP--not NAT. > > -j > > -- > Jason Opperisano > > -- Bla bla