From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Alexandru Dragoi Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:11:52 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Scalability Message-Id: <3063e5040930071119ef2975@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: References: <3063e50409290313b61b303@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3063e50409290313b61b303@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org My intension is of course to match p2p first, then others. I realised i must be more carefully with marks, since it does not get marked from first packets. I belive some sort of masks applyed to marks are necesary, the p2p should begin all with, let's say 0x2 then 3 hex "digits" so i can distinguish non p2p for other purpose later. Is it possible better ? (i bet it does). On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:00:39 +0200, Andreas Klauer wrote: > Am Thursday 30 September 2004 14:42 schrieb George Alexandru Dragoi: > > Such traffic will be matched agains src ip or dest ip, or port number > > If you can use these kinds of optimizations, then that's fine. > In my case, P2P applications can run on any port and any IP, > so it's not possible for me. If I added a filter rule like that, > chances are good that clients would find out and use these ports > for their P2P applications. > > Andreas > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ > -- Bla bla _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/