From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <307528.52616.qm@domain.hid> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 13:03:18 +0000 (GMT) From: A C MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-486611790-1262696598=:52616" Subject: [Adeos-main] __ipipe_walk_pipeline() List-Id: General discussion about Adeos List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: adeos --0-486611790-1262696598=:52616 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello,=0AIn __ipipe_handle_irq, there is a call to the function __ipipe_wa= lk_pipeline() "that plays interrupts pending in the log", is it really the = execution of the treatement linked to an interruption ? =0AIf yes, what hap= pens when there is a new interruption ? In fact, we know that Hw interrupts= are off on entry. So, if a new interruption for a more prioritary domain c= omes during the execution of __ipipe_walk_pipeline() for a less prioritary = domain, how __ipipe_walk_pipeline() is preempted ?=0ACheers=0AAdrien Chiron= & Vincent Vanbesien=0A=0A=0A=0A --0-486611790-1262696598=:52616 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,
In  __ipipe_handle_irq, there is a call to= the function __ipipe_walk_pipeline() "that plays interrupts pending in the= log", is it really the execution of the treatement linked to an interrupti= on ?
If yes, what happens when there is a new interruption ? In fact, w= e know that Hw interrupts are off on entry. So, if a new interruption for a= more prioritary domain comes during the execution of __ipipe_walk_pipeline= () for a less prioritary domain, how __ipipe_walk_pipeline() is preempted ?=
Cheers
Adrien Chiron & Vincent Vanbesien
=0A= =0A

=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A --0-486611790-1262696598=:52616--