From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [168.119.38.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AA39EAF6; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 10:17:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711448230; cv=none; b=rRTglPNTEuxAOZ4rpzRoP9iV9M5yTDuAP6zaWJDztSyRETqPloJENa1T2c38pypyr+5ISxEXCq1vfL8bm7db6jgpEwKEZ1R/jtM/HEQ5DgEA0dVAekQAind3ZavYKlOXCB/giuMMTpIjGaNytqMf5echwE30YCrgc7I8hoPsWQY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711448230; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pdDzJ4I1i10nF0ugfqTYvU9sGjwwKUbQsBGjybZ+7q4=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=M9JvaHxi317Jve+4Kvq9WxNMbXp7Be/0oYzMbICcUCYzSCV/NyCW0SKjCPdtYW9cnZzqgshbCyimjjrn2f1UtLSJdsJX7iGLOD+6cZhW6lQojw9WUvQP4yac6GlG7epoq9auEOvHWxtzZ/sRq0tHDffad9admSeq2qFNAHaMwNY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b=xn1P/ON/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b="xn1P/ON/" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=pdDzJ4I1i10nF0ugfqTYvU9sGjwwKUbQsBGjybZ+7q4=; t=1711448228; x=1712657828; b=xn1P/ON/G7JzntbIFaE/yxzQ3kNCvjqKRKyK0ju8LI8Ntm8 CFm5+VgPEnxgsDGjIZXoCYrg96AcuQU9i+Z6d+VOxrVi1D1tBo+nzoAUpm3Oza+K2ZNft3AWR8ztc 5UyD+dsKV1NRovCtOABD9pBhnW3M/YSxQVw/UrD8b0o6BeawcLHxl2Lqxerr1ewfXn0nJJa/OhJhL /1ivTposcWAQD9/bnWk13kMBWjeFqMUq9nj5rIv0XNERGarDtT9YRnyroGze125FYG5fVXcdZ1qBj 6fZjhoatJEzOvMXoTf+zypQGBWCHHfWhxX/enbO/gmnm1KvNFs6ulydUo8bsLohw==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rp3rY-0000000FdUT-0ht8; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 11:17:00 +0100 Message-ID: <3088ef70d96eaec0f33c4588581cb0f23a790b05.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH] kunit: configs: Enable CONFIG_DAMON_DBGFS_DEPRECATED for --alltests From: Johannes Berg To: David Gow , SeongJae Park , Rae Moar , Mark Brown Cc: "linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org" , "kunit-dev@googlegroups.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Shuah Khan Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 11:16:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20240326100740.178594-1-davidgow@google.com> References: <20240326100740.178594-1-davidgow@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.4 (3.50.4-1.fc39) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned On Tue, 2024-03-26 at 10:07 +0000, David Gow wrote: >=20 > Johannes: Does this conflict with the CONFIG_NETDEVICES / CONFIG_WLAN > fixes to all_tests.config? I'd assume not, but I'm happy to take them > via KUnit if you'd prefer anyway. >=20 I already have it in my tree, so I guess I'd prefer it to stay, but it also doesn't conflict at all, I added the lines before the existing wireless ones. johannes