All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@google.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: x86 rwsem: up_read() does not check active count in fast path
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 13:41:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <30960.1272976896@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100503225105.GA18897@google.com>

Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> wrote:

> Looking at the x86 rwsem code, I have been wondering about the up_read()
> path.  __rwsem_do_wake() comment mentions that one should check the active
> count on the way there; however I could not find that check when coming from
> up_read().

Look in call_rwsem_wake(), which is implemented in assembly in two places in
the x86 arch:

	arch/x86/lib/rwsem_64.S
	arch/x86/lib/semaphore_32.S

Note that the x86_64 version contains a bug, a patch for which is attached.

David
---
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Fix the x86_64 implementation of call_rwsem_wait()

The x86_64 call_rwsem_wait() treats the active state counter part of the R/W
semaphore state as being 16-bit when it's actually 32-bit (it's half of the
64-bit state).  It should do "decl %edx" not "decw %dx".

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---

 arch/x86/lib/rwsem_64.S |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)


diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/rwsem_64.S b/arch/x86/lib/rwsem_64.S
index 15acecf..41fcf00 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/rwsem_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/rwsem_64.S
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ ENTRY(call_rwsem_down_write_failed)
 	ENDPROC(call_rwsem_down_write_failed)
 
 ENTRY(call_rwsem_wake)
-	decw %dx    /* do nothing if still outstanding active readers */
+	decl %edx	/* do nothing if still outstanding active readers */
 	jnz 1f
 	save_common_regs
 	movq %rax,%rdi

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-04 12:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-03 22:51 x86 rwsem: up_read() does not check active count in fast path Michel Lespinasse
2010-05-04 12:41 ` David Howells [this message]
2010-05-04 22:38   ` Michel Lespinasse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=30960.1272976896@redhat.com \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.