From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: update cpu opp table for rk3399 op1 Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 11:15:48 +0200 Message-ID: <3119382.DFiP2J6FnE@diego> References: <1493014730-9670-1-git-send-email-wxt@rock-chips.com> <2250946.xrPjMl5Kf1@diego> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Caesar Wang Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, briannorris@chromium.org, dianders@chromium.org List-Id: linux-rockchip.vger.kernel.org Am Montag, 24. April 2017, 16:49:08 CEST schrieb Caesar Wang: > 在 2017年04月24日 16:26, Heiko Stübner 写道: > > Hi Caesar, > > > > Am Montag, 24. April 2017, 14:18:50 CEST schrieb Caesar Wang: > >> Update the cpu opp table for rk3399 op1. > > > > Ideally this should contain something about the "why". > > Are these new voltage settings safer to operate under? > > The before opp table is for earlier batch of rk3399 SoCs, that's no > enough for the current and > newer batch of rk3399 op1. In order to suit for the rk3399 op1, we need > to little voltages changed. just to make sure, this is also safe for all the non-chromebook rk3399 socs (like the firefly and tv-boxes, etc), right? Thanks Heiko From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?=) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 11:15:48 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: update cpu opp table for rk3399 op1 In-Reply-To: References: <1493014730-9670-1-git-send-email-wxt@rock-chips.com> <2250946.xrPjMl5Kf1@diego> Message-ID: <3119382.DFiP2J6FnE@diego> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Am Montag, 24. April 2017, 16:49:08 CEST schrieb Caesar Wang: > ? 2017?04?24? 16:26, Heiko St?bner ??: > > Hi Caesar, > > > > Am Montag, 24. April 2017, 14:18:50 CEST schrieb Caesar Wang: > >> Update the cpu opp table for rk3399 op1. > > > > Ideally this should contain something about the "why". > > Are these new voltage settings safer to operate under? > > The before opp table is for earlier batch of rk3399 SoCs, that's no > enough for the current and > newer batch of rk3399 op1. In order to suit for the rk3399 op1, we need > to little voltages changed. just to make sure, this is also safe for all the non-chromebook rk3399 socs (like the firefly and tv-boxes, etc), right? Thanks Heiko