From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/i915/irq: split ILK display irq handling
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 09:47:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <312ff528782df9b79af1964e8d4ac99fb6d23bdf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aNKyfVyQPpMsCpQy@intel.com>
On Tue, 23 Sep 2025, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 05:31:08PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Split out display irq handling on ilk. Since the master IRQ enable is in
>> DEIIR, we'll need to do this in two parts. First, add
>> ilk_display_irq_master_disable() to disable master and south interrupts,
>> and second, add (repurposed) ilk_display_irq_handler() to finish display
>> irq handling.
>>
>> It's not the prettiest thing you ever saw, but improves separation of
>> display irq handling. And removes HAS_PCH_NOP() and DISPLAY_VER() checks
>> from core irq code.
>>
>> v2:
>> - Separate ilk_display_irq_master_enable() (Ville)
>> - Use _fw mmio accessors (Ville)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Thanks for the swift reviews, pushed to din.
Xe CI didn't run on this version, but this does not touch any codepaths
that get run on platforms in Xe CI. And the previous version passed.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-24 6:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-23 14:31 [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/i915/irq: display irq refactoring Jani Nikula
2025-09-23 14:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/i915/irq: drop intel_psr_regs.h include Jani Nikula
2025-09-23 14:39 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-09-23 14:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/i915/irq: initialize gen2_imr_mask in terms of enable_mask Jani Nikula
2025-09-23 14:40 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-09-23 14:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/i915/irq: abstract i9xx_display_irq_enable_mask() Jani Nikula
2025-09-23 14:41 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-09-23 14:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/i915/irq: move check for HAS_HOTPLUG() inside i9xx_hpd_irq_ack() Jani Nikula
2025-09-23 14:43 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-09-23 14:31 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/i915/irq: split ILK display irq handling Jani Nikula
2025-09-23 14:45 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-09-24 6:47 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-09-23 15:08 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/i915/irq: display irq refactoring (rev2) Patchwork
2025-09-23 17:58 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-09-23 20:50 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-09-24 5:29 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=312ff528782df9b79af1964e8d4ac99fb6d23bdf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.