From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] eventtimer: introduce event timer wheel Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 17:02:43 +0200 Message-ID: <31351930.ptpEdNRZ9E@xps> References: <20170817161104.24293-1-jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com> <20170825102537.GC9774@jerin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Richardson, Bruce" , "Van Haaren, Harry" , "hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" , "Eads, Gage" , "nipun.gupta@nxp.com" , "Vangati, Narender" , "Rao, Nikhil" , "pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com" , "jianbo.liu@linaro.org" , "rsanford@akamai.com" To: Jerin Jacob , "Carrillo, Erik G" Return-path: Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C55137C for ; Tue, 29 Aug 2017 17:02:44 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20170825102537.GC9774@jerin> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 25/08/2017 12:25, Jerin Jacob: > From: "Carrillo, Erik G" [...] > > In summary, it looks like our solutions align fairly well, and I propose that we take on the software implementation if there are no objections. > > Sure, no objection. Good to see such a basic function generalized for NPU and CPU. Are you going to use rte_timer for CPU implementation? Does it mean that event_timer supersedes rte_timer?